Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27075326›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Two-Load Method for Distinguishing Between Muscle Force, Velocity, and Power-Producing Capacities.

Slobodan Jaric

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Force-Velocity Profile for Jumping: What It Is and What It Is Not.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Are the Parameters of Novel Two-Point Force-Velocity Model Generalizable in Leg Muscles?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Slobodan JaricDepartment of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology and Biomechanics and Movement Science Graduate Program, University of Delaware, Rust Arena, Rm. 153, 541 South College Avenue, Newark, DE, 19716, USA. jaric@UDel.Edu.

Funding

Evaluation of Novel Tests of Neuromuscular FunctionR21AR060659 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI JARIC, SLOBODAN · 2010 to 2011
$372k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR060659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally accepted that muscles may have different mechanical capacities, such as those for producing high force (F), velocity (V), and power (P) outputs. Nevertheless, standard procedures for evaluation of muscle function both in research and in routine testing are typically conducted under a single mechanical condition, such as a single external load. Therefore, the observed outcomes do not allow for distinguishing between the different muscle capacities. As a result, the outcomes of most routine testing procedures are of limited informational value, whereas a number of issues debated in research have originated from arbitrarily interpreted experimental findings regarding specific muscle capacities. A solution for this problem could be based on the approximately linear and exceptionally strong F-V relationship typically observed from various functional tasks performed under different external loads. These findings allow for the 'two-load method' proposed here: the functional movement tasks (e.g., maximum jumping, cycling, running, pushing, lifting, or throwing) should be tested against just two distinctive external loads. That is, the F-V relationship determined by two pairs of the F and V data could provide the parameters depicting the maximum F (i.e., the F-intercept), V (V-intercept), and P (calculated from the product of F and V) output of the tested muscles. Therefore, the proposed two-load method applied in both research and routine testing could provide a deeper insight into the mechanical properties and function of the tested muscles and resolve a number of issues debated in the literature.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaExercise TestHumansMovementMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPhysical ExertionRunningTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID27075326
PMCPMC5056118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.