Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27075185›Full record

Trial reportCognitive processing2016

Training the equidistant principle of number line spacing.

Tanja Dackermann, Ursula Fischer, Stefan Huber, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Korbinian Moeller

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cognitive processing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanja DackermannLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen, Schleichstr. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. t.dackermann@iwm-tuebingen.de.
Ursula FischerLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen, Schleichstr. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Stefan HuberLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen, Schleichstr. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Hans-Christoph NuerkLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen, Schleichstr. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Korbinian MoellerLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen, Schleichstr. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characteristics of effective numerical trainings are still under scientific debate. Given the importance of number line estimation due to the strong relation between task performance and arithmetic abilities, the current study aimed at training one important number line characteristic: the equidistant spacing of adjacent numbers. Following an embodied training approach, second-graders were trained using a randomized crossover design to divide a presented line into different numbers of equal segments by walking the line with equally spaced steps. Performance was recorded, and feedback as to the correct equidistant spacing was provided using the Kinect sensor system. Training effects were compared to a control training with no involvement of task-specific whole-body movements. Results indicated more pronounced specific training effects after the embodied training. Moreover, transfer effects to number line estimation and arithmetic performance were partially observed. In particular, differential training effects for bounded versus unbounded number line estimation corroborate the assumption that not only bodily experiences but also the need for a flexible adaption of the perspective on the training material might influence training success. Hence, more pronounced training effects of the embodied training might stem from different cognitive processes involved.

Indexed as

MathematicsTeachingAnalysis of VarianceChildCross-Over StudiesFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansMaleProblem SolvingSpace PerceptionTransfer, PsychologyBounded/unbounded number line estimation taskEquidistanceMathematical skillsMental number lineNumber line estimation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.