ArticleNature2016
Differential DNA repair underlies mutation hotspots at active promoters in cancer genomes.
Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
130 citing papers in PubMed, 219 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Environmental and Endogenous Damage on Somatic Mutation Load in Human Skin Fibroblasts.PLoS genetics · 2016Trial
- High-throughput characterization of transcription factors that modulate UV damage formation and repair at single-nucleotide resolution.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- High-throughput characterization of transcription factors that modulate UV damage formation and repair at single-nucleotide resolution.Research square · 2025Article
- Transcription start sites experience a high influx of heritable variants fueled by early development.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Dynamic genome-wide mapping reveals how chromatin context shapes OGG1-mediated repair and related mutagenesis in human cells.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- The Noncoding Mutational Landscape of Pancreatic Cancer Reveals Recurrent Somatic Mutations in Enhancer Regions.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Illuminating the Noncoding Genome in Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Genome-wide maps of UV damage repair and mutation suppression by CPD photolyase.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- The epigenetic landscape shapes smoking-induced mutagenesis by modulating DNA damage susceptibility and repair efficiency.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- DNA replication initiation drives focal mutagenesis and rearrangements in human cancers.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Somatic mosaicism in schizophrenia brains reveals prenatal mutational processes.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- ERCC2 mutations alter the genomic distribution pattern of somatic mutations and are independently prognostic in bladder cancer.Cell genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Mutation rate heterogeneity at the sub-gene scale due to local DNA hypomethylation.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Genome-wide profiles of DNA damage represent highly accurate predictors of mammalian age.Aging cell · 2024Article
- The SMC5/6 complex: folding chromosomes back into shape when genomes take a break.Nucleic acids research · 2024Review
- High UV damage and low repair, but not cytosine deamination, stimulate mutation hotspots at ETS binding sites in melanoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Hotspot propensity across mutational processes.Molecular systems biology · 2024Article
- Towards functional maps of non-coding variants in cancer.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Promoters are DNA sequences that have an essential role in controlling gene expression. While recent whole cancer genome analyses have identified numerous hotspots of somatic point mutations within promoters, many have not yet been shown to perturb gene expression or drive cancer development. As such, positive selection alone may not adequately explain the frequency of promoter point mutations in cancer genomes. Here we show that increased mutation density at gene promoters can be linked to promoter activity and differential nucleotide excision repair (NER). By analysing 1,161 human cancer genomes across 14 cancer types, we find evidence for increased local density of somatic point mutations within the centres of DNase I-hypersensitive sites (DHSs) in gene promoters. Mutated DHSs were strongly associated with transcription initiation activity, in which active promoters but not enhancers of equal DNase I hypersensitivity were most mutated relative to their flanking regions. Notably, analysis of genome-wide maps of NER shows that NER is impaired within the DHS centre of active gene promoters, while XPC-deficient skin cancers do not show increased promoter mutation density, pinpointing differential NER as the underlying cause of these mutation hotspots. Consistent with this finding, we observe that melanomas with an ultraviolet-induced DNA damage mutation signature show greatest enrichment of promoter mutations, whereas cancers that are not highly dependent on NER, such as colon cancer, show no sign of such enrichment. Taken together, our analysis has uncovered the presence of a previously unknown mechanism linking transcription initiation and NER as a major contributor of somatic point mutation hotspots at active gene promoters in cancer genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.