Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27074859›Full record

ArticleIET nanobiotechnology2016

Effect of poly-glutamate on uptake efficiency and cytotoxicity of cell penetrating peptides.

Samad Mussa Farkhani, Ali Shirani, Samaneh Mohammadi, Parvin Zakeri-Milani, Javid Shahbazi Mojarrad, Hadi Valizadeh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samad Mussa FarkhaniStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali ShiraniStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Samaneh MohammadiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Parvin Zakeri-MilaniLiver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Javid Shahbazi MojarradBiotechnology Research Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hadi ValizadehDrug Applied Research Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. valizadeh@tbzmed.ac.ir.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) were developed as vehicles for efficient delivery of various molecules. An ideal CPP-peptide should not display any toxicity against cancer cells as well as healthy cells and efficiently enter into the cell. Because of the cationic nature and the intrinsic vector capabilities, these peptides can cause cytotoxicity. One of the possible reasons for toxicity of CPPs is direct translocation and consequently, pore formation on the plasma membrane. In this study it was demonstrated that interaction of poly-glutamate with CPP considerably reduced their cytotoxicity in A549 cell. This strategy could be useful for efficient drug delivery mediated by CPP.

Indexed as

Cell Membrane PermeabilityAmino Acid SequenceCell-Penetrating PeptidesCell SurvivalDrug Delivery SystemsFlow CytometryFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateHumansMaterials TestingMicroscopy, FluorescenceNanoconjugatesPolyglutamic AcidTumor Cells, CulturedCell-Penetrating PeptidesFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateNanoconjugatesPolyglutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID27074859
PMCPMC8676496
OpenAlexW2265596469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.