Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27074706›Full record

ReviewGenome medicine2016

The effects of antibiotics on the microbiome throughout development and alternative approaches for therapeutic modulation.

Amy Langdon, Nathan Crook, Gautam Dantas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 410 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
410citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
50.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

410 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 886 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

350 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy LangdonCenter for Genome Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8510, 4515 McKinley Research Building, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA.
Nathan CrookCenter for Genome Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8510, 4515 McKinley Research Building, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA.
Gautam DantasCenter for Genome Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8510, 4515 McKinley Research Building, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA. dantas@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Pediatric Gastroenterology Research Training ProgramT32DK077653 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIP I TARR · 2007 to 2026
$5.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesTL1TR000449 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
METAGENOMIC ENGINEERING OF PROBIOTIC BACTERIA TO IMPROVE INTESTINAL COLONIZATIONDP2DK098089 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DANTAS, GAUTAM · 2012 to 2012
$2.1M
ESTABLISHMENT AND DYNAMICS OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE RESERVOIRS IN DEVELOPING INTER01GM099538 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DANTAS, GAUTAM · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000449NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NIDDK NIH HHS DP2 DK098089NIDDK NIH HHS DP2-DK-098089NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK077653NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099538NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM099538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of antibiotics in the past 80 years has saved millions of human lives, facilitated technological progress and killed incalculable numbers of microbes, both pathogenic and commensal. Human-associated microbes perform an array of important functions, and we are now just beginning to understand the ways in which antibiotics have reshaped their ecology and the functional consequences of these changes. Mounting evidence shows that antibiotics influence the function of the immune system, our ability to resist infection, and our capacity for processing food. Therefore, it is now more important than ever to revisit how we use antibiotics. This review summarizes current research on the short-term and long-term consequences of antibiotic use on the human microbiome, from early life to adulthood, and its effect on diseases such as malnutrition, obesity, diabetes, and Clostridium difficile infection. Motivated by the consequences of inappropriate antibiotic use, we explore recent progress in the development of antivirulence approaches for resisting infection while minimizing resistance to therapy. We close the article by discussing probiotics and fecal microbiota transplants, which promise to restore the microbiota after damage of the microbiome. Together, the results of studies in this field emphasize the importance of developing a mechanistic understanding of gut ecology to enable the development of new therapeutic strategies and to rationally limit the use of antibiotic compounds.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsDisease SusceptibilityHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID27074706
PMCPMC4831151
OpenAlexW2336105168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.