Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27074263›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016

Interventions for the management of fatigue in adults with a primary brain tumour.

Julia Day, Shlomit Yust-Katz, David Cachia, Jeffrey Wefel, Lior H Katz, Ivo Tremont, Helen Bulbeck, Terri Armstrong, Alasdair G Rooney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence, correlates, and impact of sleep disturbance in Chinese meningioma patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia DayEdinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology (ECNO), Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, EH4 2XU.
Shlomit Yust-Katz
David Cachia
Jeffrey Wefel
Lior H Katz
Ivo Tremont
Helen Bulbeck
Terri Armstrong
Alasdair G Rooney
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USWestern General Hospital · GBEntrust · GBMedical University of South Carolina · USMethodist Hospital · USRabin Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatigue is a common and disabling symptom in people with a primary brain tumour (PBT). The effectiveness of interventions for treating clinically significant levels of fatigue in this population is unclear.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for adults with PBT and high levels of fatigue. SEARCH

methodsIn March 2016, we searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL and checked the reference lists of included studies. We also searched relevant conference proceedings, searched for ongoing trials via ClinicalTrials.gov and contacted major co-operative groups with trials in this area. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated any pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention in adults with PBT and fatigue, where fatigue was the primary outcome measure. We restricted inclusion specifically to studies that enrolled only participants with clinically significant levels of fatigue. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors (JD, SYK, DC) independently evaluated search results, extracted data from selected studies and carried out a bias risk assessment. We extracted data on fatigue, cognition, mood, quality of life and adverse events outcomes. MAIN

resultsWe identified nine studies. We excluded eight of these as they did not restrict participation to people with high fatigue. The single eligible trial investigated the use of modafinil compared to placebo. Although this study found a significant improvement over time in the primary outcome of fatigue, the improvement occurred after both modafinil and placebo with no significant difference in response between the two groups. The included trial did not reach its planned recruitment target and therefore may not, in practice, have been adequately powered to detect a difference. The trial was at a low risk of bias across most areas. There was an unclear risk of bias related to the use of mean imputation because the investigators did not analyse the impact of imputation on the results. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere was insufficient evidence to draw reliable and generalisable conclusions regarding potential effectiveness or harm of any pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments for fatigue in people with PBT. More research is needed on how best to treat people with brain tumours with high fatigue.

Indexed as

AdultBenzhydryl CompoundsBrain NeoplasmsFatigueHumansModafinilRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWakefulness-Promoting AgentsBenzhydryl CompoundsModafinilWakefulness-Promoting Agents

Identifiers

PMID27074263
PMCPMC8719625
OpenAlexW1749799420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.