Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27074153›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

An Integrated Genome-Wide Systems Genetics Screen for Breast Cancer Metastasis Susceptibility Genes.

Ling Bai, Howard H Yang, Ying Hu, Anjali Shukla, Ngoc-Han Ha, Anthony Doran, Farhoud Faraji, Natalie Goldberger, Maxwell P Lee, Thomas Keane and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SMARCD1 is a "Goldilocks" metastasis modifier.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Metastasis suppressors: functional pathways.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ling BaiLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Howard H YangLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Ying HuCenter for Bioinformatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Anjali ShuklaLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Ngoc-Han HaLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Anthony DoranComputational Genomics Program, Welcome Trust Sanger Centre, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Farhoud FarajiLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Natalie GoldbergerLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Maxwell P LeeLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Thomas KeaneComputational Genomics Program, Welcome Trust Sanger Centre, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kent W HunterLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · USWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Genetic Modifiers of Intitiation and Progression of Mammary CancerZIABC011255 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HUNTER, KENT WILLIAM · 2010 to 2025
$33.2M
Integrated analyses of genetics, epigenetics, and gene expressionZIHBC011703 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LEE, MAXWELL · 2016 to 2025
$10.9M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis remains the primary cause of patient morbidity and mortality in solid tumors and is due to the action of a large number of tumor-autonomous and non-autonomous factors. Here we report the results of a genome-wide integrated strategy to identify novel metastasis susceptibility candidate genes and molecular pathways in breast cancer metastasis. This analysis implicates a number of transcriptional regulators and suggests cell-mediated immunity is an important determinant. Moreover, the analysis identified novel or FDA-approved drugs as potentially useful for anti-metastatic therapy. Further explorations implementing this strategy may therefore provide a variety of information for clinical applications in the control and treatment of advanced neoplastic disease.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAnimalsCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome-Wide Association StudyKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLung NeoplasmsMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred NZBMice, TransgenicNectinsPromyelocytic Leukemia Zinc Finger ProteinCell Adhesion MoleculesKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsNectinsPromyelocytic Leukemia Zinc Finger ProteinRNA, Small InterferingRosiglitazoneThiazolidinedionesZbtb16 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID27074153
PMCPMC4830524
OpenAlexW2338081144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.