Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27073672›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2016

Capture of esophageal and breast cancer cells with polymeric microfluidic devices for CTC isolation.

Takashi Ohnaga, Yutaka Shimada, Koji Takata, Tsutomu Obata, Tomoyuki Okumura, Takuya Nagata, Hiroyuki Kishi, Atsushi Muraguchi, Kazuhiro Tsukada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Epithelial membrane protein 2: a novel biomarker for circulating tumor cell recovery in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Takashi OhnagaCentral Research Laboratories, Toyama Industrial Technology Center, Takaoka, Toyama 933-0981, Japan.
Yutaka ShimadaDepartment of Nanobio Drug Discovery, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Koji TakataCentral Research Laboratories, Toyama Industrial Technology Center, Takaoka, Toyama 933-0981, Japan.
Tsutomu ObataCentral Research Laboratories, Toyama Industrial Technology Center, Takaoka, Toyama 933-0981, Japan.
Tomoyuki OkumuraDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Takuya NagataDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Hiroyuki KishiDepartment of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Atsushi MuraguchiDepartment of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Kazuhiro TsukadaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study evaluated the capture efficiency of esophageal and breast cancer cells with a modified 'polymeric circulating tumor cells (CTC)-chip' microfluidic device, which was developed for the isolation of circulating tumor cells. Esophageal cancer cell lines KYSE150, KYSE220 and KYSE510, and breast cancer cell lines MCF7, SKBR3 and MDA-MB-231 were used for evaluation. The capture efficiencies of the esophageal cancer cell lines in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were ~0.9, irrespective of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) expression, which was represented as the mean fluorescent intensity from 528 to 76. In the breast cancer cell lines, efficient capture was observed for MCF7 and SKBR3 in PBS; however, a low value of ~0.1 was obtained for MDA-MB-231. Fluorescent imaging of immunolabeled cells revealed marginal EpCAM expression in MDA-MB-231. Using whole blood, no clogging occurred in the microstructure-modified CTC-chip and efficiency of capture was successfully evaluated. Capture efficiencies for KYSE220 and MCF7 in whole blood were >0.7, but were of either equal or lesser efficiency in comparison to PBS. Therefore, the modified CTC-chip appears useful for clinical application due to its cost, practicality of use, and efficient cancer cell capture.

Indexed as

breast cancer cellcirculating tumor cellepithelial cell adhesion moleculeesophageal cancer cellmicrofluidic devicepolymer

Identifiers

PMID27073672
PMCPMC4812118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.