Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27073380›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2016

Neuroprotection of Chrysanthemum indicum Linne against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury by anti-inflammatory effect in gerbils.

Ki-Yeon Yoo, In Hye Kim, Jeong-Hwi Cho, Ji Hyeon Ahn, Joon Ha Park, Jae-Chul Lee, Hyun-Jin Tae, Dae Won Kim, Jong-Dai Kim, Seongkweon Hong and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Experimental pretreatment with YES-10Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. YES-10, A Combination of Extracts fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. PretreatedNeural regeneration research · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. PretreatedChinese medical journal · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ki-Yeon YooDepartment of Oral Anatomy, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
In Hye KimDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Hwi ChoDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyeon AhnDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Joon Ha ParkDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Chul LeeDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Jin TaeDepartment of Biomedical Science, Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Dae Won KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Dai KimDivision of Food Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Seongkweon HongDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Moo-Ho WonDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7178-6501
Il Jun KangDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0314-5195
Kangwon National University · KRGangneung–Wonju National University · KRHallym University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we tried to verify the neuroprotective effect of Chrysanthemum indicum Linne (CIL) extract, which has been used as a botanical drug in East Asia, against ischemic damage and to explore the underlying mechanism involving the anti-inflammatory approach. A gerbil was given CIL extract for 7 consecutive days followed by bilateral carotid artery occlusion to make a cerebral ischemia/reperfusion model. Then, we found that CIL extracts protected pyramidal neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region (CA1) from ischemic damage using neuronal nucleus immunohistochemistry and Fluoro-Jade B histofluorescence. Accordingly, interleukin-13 immunoreactivities in the CA1 pyramidal neurons of CIL-pretreated animals were maintained or increased after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. These findings indicate that the pre-treatment of CIL can attenuate neuronal damage/death in the brain after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion via an anti-inflammatory approach.

Indexed as

delayed neuronal deathinflammatory cytokinesnerve regenerationneural regenerationpyramidal neuronstransient cerebral ischemia

Identifiers

PMID27073380
PMCPMC4810991
OpenAlexW2301278581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.