Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27073279›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

Exploration of Methods Used by Pharmacy Professional Programs to Contract with Experiential Practice Sites.

Angela Brownfield, Linda Garavalia, Paul O Gubbins, Valerie Ruehter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela BrownfieldUniversity of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Linda GaravaliaUniversity of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Paul O GubbinsUniversity of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Valerie RuehterUniversity of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. To explore methods used by pharmacy programs to attract and sustain relationships with preceptors and experiential practice sites. Methods. Interviews with eight focus groups of pharmacy experiential education experts (n=35) were conducted at two national pharmacy meetings. A semi-structured interview guide was used. Focus group interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and categorically coded independently by two researchers. Codes were compared, consensus was reached through discussion, and two experiential education experts assisted with interpretation of the coded data. Results. Six themes emerged consistently across focus groups: a perceived increase in preceptor compensation, intended vs actual use of payments by sites, concern over renegotiation of established compensation, costs and benefits of experiential students, territorialism, and motives. Conclusion. Fostering a culture of collaboration may counteract potentially competitive strategies to gain sites. Participants shared a common interest in providing high-quality experiential learning where sites and preceptors participated for altruistic reasons, rather than compensation.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorCurriculumEducation, PharmacyHumansPharmaceutical ServicesPharmaciesPreceptorshipProblem-Based LearningProgram DevelopmentSchools, PharmacyStudents, Pharmacyadvanced pharmacy practice experiencecompensationexperiential educationintroductory pharmacy practice experiencerotation

Identifiers

PMID27073279
PMCPMC4827577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.