Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27073211›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2016

Intervention to reduce heat stress and improve efficiency among sugarcane workers in El Salvador: Phase 1.

T Bodin, R García-Trabanino, I Weiss, E Jarquín, J Glaser, K Jakobsson, R A I Lucas, C Wesseling, C Hogstedt, D H Wegman and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Work and work exposures in sugarcane farming in Eswatini, Southern Africa.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

T BodinInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
R García-TrabaninoAssociation of Nephrology and Hypertension of El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador.
I WeissLa Isla Foundation, Ada, Michigan, USA.
E JarquínAgency for Development and Agricultural Health (AGDYSA), San Salvador, El Salvador.
J GlaserLa Isla Foundation, Ada, Michigan, USA.
K JakobssonDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
R A I LucasSchool of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
C WesselingInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
C HogstedtInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
D H WegmanDepartment of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
WE Program Working Group
Karolinska Institutet · SEHypertension Institute · USUnited States Agency for International Development · USUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic heat stress and dehydration from strenuous work in hot environments is considered an essential component of the epidemic of chronic kidney disease in Central America.

objective(1) To assess feasibility of providing an intervention modelled on OSHA's Water.Rest.Shade programme (WRS) during sugarcane cutting and (2) to prevent heat stress and dehydration without decreasing productivity.

methodsMidway through the 6-month harvest, the intervention introduced WRS practices. A 60-person cutting group was provided water supplied in individual backpacks, mobile shaded rest areas and scheduled rest periods. Ergonomically improved machetes and efficiency strategies were also implemented. Health data (anthropometric, blood, urine, questionnaires) were collected preharvest, preintervention, mid-intervention and at the end of harvest. A subsample participated in focus group discussions. Daily wet bulb globe temperatures (WBGT) were recorded. The employer provided individual production records.

resultsOver the harvest WBGT was >26°C from 9:00 onwards reaching average maximum of 29.3±1.7°C, around 13:00. Postintervention self-reported water consumption increased 25%. Symptoms associated with heat stress and with dehydration decreased. Individual daily production increased from 5.1 to a high of 7.3 tons/person/day postintervention. This increase was greater than in other cutting groups at the company. Focus groups reported a positive perception of components of the WRS, and the new machete and cutting programmes.

conclusionsA WRS intervention is feasible in sugarcane fields, and appears to markedly reduce the impact of the heat stress conditions for the workforce. With proper attention to work practices, production can be maintained with less impact on worker health.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDrinking WaterEfficiencyEl SalvadorErgonomicsFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHeat Stress DisordersHot TemperatureHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureDrinking WaterSucroseChronic kidney diseaseDehydrationHeat StressInterventionMesoamerican nephropathy

Identifiers

PMID27073211
PMCPMC4893112
OpenAlexW2339194389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.