Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27073098›Full record

ArticlemBio2016

Clusters of Antibiotic Resistance Genes Enriched Together Stay Together in Swine Agriculture.

Timothy A Johnson, Robert D Stedtfeld, Qiong Wang, James R Cole, Syed A Hashsham, Torey Looft, Yong-Guan Zhu, James M Tiedje

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic insights into extended-spectrumJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Antibiotic perturbations to the gut microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy A JohnsonCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Robert D StedtfeldCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Qiong WangCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
James R ColeCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Syed A HashshamCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Torey LooftFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Yong-Guan ZhuKey Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
James M TiedjeCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA tiedjej@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USInstitute of Urban Environment · CNNational Animal Disease Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAntibiotic resistance is a worldwide health risk, but the influence of animal agriculture on the genetic context and enrichment of individual antibiotic resistance alleles remains unclear. Using quantitative PCR followed by amplicon sequencing, we quantified and sequenced 44 genes related to antibiotic resistance, mobile genetic elements, and bacterial phylogeny in microbiomes from U.S. laboratory swine and from swine farms from three Chinese regions. We identified highly abundant resistance clusters: groups of resistance and mobile genetic element alleles that cooccur. For example, the abundance of genes conferring resistance to six classes of antibiotics together with class 1 integrase and the abundance of IS6100-type transposons in three Chinese regions are directly correlated. These resistance cluster genes likely colocalize in microbial genomes in the farms. Resistance cluster alleles were dramatically enriched (up to 1 to 10% as abundant as 16S rRNA) and indicate that multidrug-resistant bacteria are likely the norm rather than an exception in these communities. This enrichment largely occurred independently of phylogenetic composition; thus, resistance clusters are likely present in many bacterial taxa. Furthermore, resistance clusters contain resistance genes that confer resistance to antibiotics independently of their particular use on the farms. Selection for these clusters is likely due to the use of only a subset of the broad range of chemicals to which the clusters confer resistance. The scale of animal agriculture and its wastes, the enrichment and horizontal gene transfer potential of the clusters, and the vicinity of large human populations suggest that managing this resistance reservoir is important for minimizing human risk. IMPORTANCE: Agricultural antibiotic use results in clusters of cooccurring resistance genes that together confer resistance to multiple antibiotics. The use of a single antibiotic could select for an entire suite of resistance genes if they are genetically linked. No links to bacterial membership were observed for these clusters of resistance genes. These findings urge deeper understanding of colocalization of resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in resistance islands and their distribution throughout antibiotic-exposed microbiomes. As governments seek to combat the rise in antibiotic resistance, a balance is sought between ensuring proper animal health and welfare and preserving medically important antibiotics for therapeutic use. Metagenomic and genomic monitoring will be critical to determine if resistance genes can be reduced in animal microbiomes, or if these gene clusters will continue to be coselected by antibiotics not deemed medically important for human health but used for growth promotion or by medically important antibiotics used therapeutically.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsChinaDrug Resistance, BacterialInterspersed Repetitive SequencesPhylogenySwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27073098
PMCPMC4959523
OpenAlexW2341520504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.