Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27073079›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2016

Minimally Invasive Approach for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Complication Between Splenic Vessel Conserving and Warshaw's Technique.

Lip Seng Lee, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Chang Moo Kang, Woo Jung Lee

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy with Vein Scarifying and Artery Saving as an Alternative for Warshaw Method.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dual-Incision Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: Merits Compared to the Conventional Method.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lip Seng LeeDepartment of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ho Kyoung HwangDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Chang Moo KangDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. cmkang@yuhs.ac.
Woo Jung LeeDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Yonsei University · KRChangi General Hospital · SGSeverance Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with Warshaw's technique (WT) was reported to have higher spleen-related complication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complication between the splenic vessel-conserving technique (SVC) and the WT when they were performed by the minimally invasive approach.

methodsFrom January 2006 to June 2015, data of the patients who had laparoscopic or robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for benign or borderline malignant tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into SVC and the WT group for comparison.

resultsOf the 89 patients who had the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 63 were SVC, whereas 26 were WT. The CT scans showed that patients who had WT were found to have higher rate of splenic infarction (P < 0.001) and had significantly higher rate of collateral vessel formation at 1 year (P < 0.001). All the splenic infarctions were low grade and asymptomatic which resolved spontaneously. None of the patients with collateral formation experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. The postoperative complication of SVC and WT did not differ significantly.

conclusionSVC and WT were found to have comparable outcome. Both techniques can be used to achieve higher spleen-preserving rate.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpleenSplenic ArterySpleen-preserving distal pancreatectomySplenic infarctionWarshaw’s technique

Identifiers

PMID27073079
OpenAlexW2341367790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.