Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27073014›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2016

Prevention knowledge, risk behaviours and seroprevalence among nonurban injectors of southwest Connecticut.

Lauretta E Grau, Weihai Zhan, Robert Heimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauretta E GrauDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA. lauretta.grau@yale.edu.
Weihai ZhanDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA.
Robert HeimerDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, USA.
Yale New Haven Health System · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Environmental Factors in HIV Transmission among Suburban IDUsR01DA023408 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HEIMER, ROBERT · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsLittle is known about injection-associated risk behaviours, knowledge and seroprevalence of viral infections among people who inject drugs (PWID) in nonurban locales in the US. Harm reduction services are more available in urban locales. The present study examined a cohort of active PWID residing in non urban areas of Connecticut to investigate how primarily injecting in urban or non urban areas was associated with injection-associated risk behaviours, knowledge and prevalence of blood-borne viruses. DESIGN AND

methodsWe described the sample and performed bivariate and multivariable analyses on injection-associated risk behaviours, HIV/hepatitis/overdose knowledge and baseline serological data to identify differences between individuals who injected primarily in nonurban locales and those who did not.

resultsHarm reduction knowledge and use of harm reduction services were poor in both groups. Those injecting most often in urban settings were 1.88 (1.19, 2.98 95% confidence interval) times more likely to engage in at least one injection-associated risk behaviour than their nonurban counterpart. Seroprevalence rates (23.6% for hepatitis B virus, 39.2% for hepatitis C virus, and 1.1% for HIV) were no different between the two groups. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThe data provided little evidence that the benefits of urban harm reduction programs, such as syringe exchange, risk reduction interventions and education programs have penetrated into this nonurban population, even among those who injected in urban locales where such programs exist. Harm reduction interventions for nonurban communities of PWID are needed to reduce HIV and hepatitis B and C transmission. [Grau LB, Zhan W, Heimer R. Prevention knowledge, risk behaviours and seroprevalence among nonurban injectors of southwest Connecticut. Drug Alcohol Rev 2016;35:628-636].

Indexed as

Harm ReductionRisk-TakingAdultConnecticutFemaleHepatitis BHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedle-Exchange ProgramsPrevalenceSeroepidemiologic StudiesSubstance Abuse, IntravenousYoung AdulthepatitisHIV/AIDSinjection drug useprevalencerisk

Identifiers

PMID27073014
PMCPMC5031506
OpenAlexW2339953819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.