Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27072986›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2016

The Discovery and Validation of Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Squamous Dysplasia and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

George Couch, James E Redman, Lorenz Wernisch, Richard Newton, Shalini Malhotra, Sanford M Dawsey, Pierre Lao-Sirieix, Rebecca C Fitzgerald

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fixing the GAP: The role of RhoGAPs in cancer.European journal of cell biology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

George CouchMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
James E RedmanMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lorenz WernischMRC Biostatistics Unit, Robinson Way, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard NewtonMRC Biostatistics Unit, Robinson Way, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Shalini MalhotraDepartment of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sanford M DawseyDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland.
Pierre Lao-SirieixMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rebecca C FitzgeraldMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. RCF29@MRC-CU.cam.ac.uk.
Hutchison/MRC Research Centre · GBMRC Biostatistics Unit · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCancer Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer StudiesZIACP000185 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ABNET, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2025
$25.6M
Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-011Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP000185Medical Research Council MC_U105260799Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 5-year survival rate of esophageal cancer is less than 10% in developing countries, where more than 90% of these cancers are esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC). Endoscopic screening is undertaken in high incidence areas. Biomarker analysis could reduce the subjectivity associated with histologic assessment of dysplasia and thus improve diagnostic accuracy. The aims of this study were therefore to identify biomarkers for esophageal squamous dysplasia and carcinoma. A publicly available dataset was used to identify genes with differential expression in ESCC compared with normal esophagus. Each gene was ranked by a support vector machine separation score. Expression profiles were examined, before validation by qPCR and IHC. We found that 800 genes were overexpressed in ESCC compared with normal esophagus (P < 10(-5)). Of the top 50 genes, 33 were expressed in ESCC epithelium and not in normal esophagus epithelium or stroma using the Protein Atlas website. These were taken to qPCR validation, and 20 genes were significantly overexpressed in ESCC compared with normal esophagus (P < 0.05). TNFAIP3 and CHN1 showed differential expression with IHC. TNFAIP3 expression increased gradually through normal esophagus, mild, moderate and severe dysplasia, and SCC (P < 0.0001). CHN1 staining was rarely present in the top third of normal esophagus epithelium and extended progressively towards the surface in mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia, and SCC (P < 0.0001). Two novel promising biomarkers for ESCC were identified, TNFAIP3 and CHN1. CHN1 and TNFAIP3 may improve diagnostic accuracy of screening methods for ESCC. Cancer Prev Res; 9(7); 558-66. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellChimerin 1Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaGene Expression ProfilingHumansPrecancerous ConditionsTranscriptomeTumor Necrosis Factor alpha-Induced Protein 3Biomarkers, TumorChimerin 1TNFAIP3 protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor alpha-Induced Protein 3

Identifiers

PMID27072986
PMCPMC5777151
OpenAlexW2342082424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.