Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27072636›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2016

Association of infertility and fertility treatment with mammographic density in a large screening-based cohort of women: a cross-sectional study.

Frida E Lundberg, Anna L V Johansson, Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg, Judith S Brand, Kamila Czene, Per Hall, Anastasia N Iliadou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frida E LundbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden. frida.lundberg@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-7178
Anna L V JohanssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Kenny Rodriguez-WallbergDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, 141 86, Sweden.
Judith S BrandDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Kamila CzeneDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Per HallDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Anastasia N IliadouDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, Stockholm, 171 77, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian stimulation drugs, in particular hormonal agents used for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) required to perform in vitro fertilization, increase estrogen and progesterone levels and have therefore been suspected to influence breast cancer risk. This study aims to investigate whether infertility and hormonal fertility treatment influences mammographic density, a strong hormone-responsive risk factor for breast cancer.

methodsCross-sectional study including 43,313 women recruited to the Karolinska Mammography Project between 2010 and 2013. Among women who reported having had infertility, 1576 had gone through COS, 1429 had had hormonal stimulation without COS and 5958 had not received any hormonal fertility treatment. Percent and absolute mammographic densities were obtained using the volumetric method Volpara™. Associations with mammographic density were assessed using multivariable generalized linear models, estimating mean differences (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

resultsAfter multivariable adjustment, women with a history of infertility had 1.53 cm(3) higher absolute dense volume compared to non-infertile women (95 % CI: 0.70 to 2.35). Among infertile women, only those who had gone through COS treatment had a higher absolute dense volume than those who had not received any hormone treatment (adjusted MD 3.22, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 5.33). No clear associations were observed between infertility, fertility treatment and percent volumetric density.

conclusionsOverall, women reporting infertility had more dense tissue in the breast. The higher absolute dense volume in women treated with COS may indicate a treatment effect, although part of the association might also be due to the underlying infertility. Continued monitoring of cancer risk in infertile women, especially those who undergo COS, is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFertilization in VitroGonadotropinsHumansInfertility, FemaleMammary Glands, HumanMammographyMiddle AgedOvulation InductionRisk FactorsGonadotropinsGonadotropinsICSIInfertilityIn vitro fertilizationIVFMammographic densityOvarian stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27072636
PMCPMC4830010
OpenAlexW2335779046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.