Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27072626›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of cancer care2017

The use of bisphosphonates in the management of bone involvement from solid tumours and haematological malignancies - a European survey.

T Lebret, A Casas, M Cavo, P J Woll, C Deleplace, C Kennedy, P Schoen, C Jackisch

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of cancer care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of bone health in patients with cancer: a survey of specialist nurses.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Health resource utilization associated with skeletal-related events: results from a retrospective European study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

T LebretDepartement d'Urologie, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
A CasasServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
M CavoDepartimento di Ematologia e Scienze Oncologiche, Universita di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
P J WollUniversity of Sheffield Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
C DeleplaceKantar Health France, Montrouge Cedex, France.
C KennedyAmgen Ltd, Uxbridge, UK.
P SchoenAmgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland.
C JackischDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Offenbach Frauenklinik Starkenburgring, Offenbach, Germany.
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHAmgen (United Kingdom) · GBHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESIstituto di Ematologia di Bologna · ITKantar Health (United States) · USSana Klinikum Offenbach · DEUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone metastases in patients with solid tumours (ST) and bone lesions in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) are common. Associated skeletal-related events (SREs) cause severe pain, reduced quality of life and place a burden on health care resources. Bone-targeted agents can reduce the risk of SREs. We evaluated the management of bone metastasis/lesions in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK) by an observational chart audit. In total, 881 physicians completed brief questionnaires on 17 193 patients during the observation period, and detailed questionnaires for a further 9303 individuals. Patient cases were weighted according to the probability of inclusion. Although a large proportion of patients with bone metastases/lesions were receiving bisphosphonates, many had their treatment stopped (ST, 19%; HM, 36%) or will never be treated (ST, 18%; HM, 13%). The results were generally similar across the countries, although German patients were more likely to have asymptomatic bone lesions detected during routine imaging. In conclusion, many patients who could benefit from bone-targeted agents do not receive bisphosphonates and many have their treatment stopped when they could benefit from continued treatment. Developing treatment guidelines, educating physicians and increasing the availability of new agents could benefit patients and reduce costs.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsDiphosphonatesEuropeFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesbisphosphonatebone metastasesbone-targeted agenthaematological malignancyskeletal-related eventsolid tumour

Identifiers

PMID27072626
PMCPMC5516244
OpenAlexW2339758831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.