Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27072565›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2016

Suitability of Sludge Biotic Index (SBI), Sludge Index (SI) and filamentous bacteria analysis for assessing activated sludge process performance: the case of piggery slaughterhouse wastewater.

Roberta Pedrazzani, Laura Menoni, Stefano Nembrini, Livia Manili, Giorgio Bertanza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberta PedrazzaniDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (DIMI), Universita degli Studi di Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123, Brescia, Italy. roberta.pedrazzani@unibs.it.
Laura MenoniDepartment of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics (DICATAM), Universita degli Studi di Brescia, via Branze 43, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Stefano NembriniDepartment of Economics and Management (DEM), Universita degli Studi di Brescia, via S. Faustino 74/B, 25122, Brescia, Italy.
Livia ManiliDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (DIMI), Universita degli Studi di Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Giorgio BertanzaDepartment of Civil, Environmental, Architectural Engineering and Mathematics (DICATAM), Universita degli Studi di Brescia, via Branze 43, 25123, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Piggery slaughterhouse wastewater poses serious issues in terms of disposal feasibility and environmental impact, due to its huge organic load and variability. It is commonly treated by means of activated sludge processes, whose performance, in case of municipal wastewater, can be monitored by means of specific analyses, such as Sludge Biotic Index (SBI), Sludge Index (SI) and floc and filamentous bacteria observation. Therefore, this paper was aimed at assessing the applicability of these techniques to piggery slaughterhouse sewage. A plant located in Northern Italy was monitored for 1 year. Physical, chemical and operation parameters were measured; the activated sludge community (ciliates, flagellates, amoebae and small metazoa) was analysed for calculating SBI and SI. Floc and filamentous bacteria were examined and described accordingly with internationally adopted criteria. The results showed the full applicability of the studied techniques for optimizing the operation of a piggery slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnimalsBacteriaBiological AssayBiological Oxygen Demand AnalysisBiomassItalyModels, TheoreticalNitrogenSewageSwineWaste Disposal, FluidNitrogenSewageBiological indicatorsMicrobial ecologyMicrofaunaProtozoaRandom forests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.