Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27072562›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2016

Liquid-based three-dimensional tumor models for cancer research and drug discovery.

Stephanie L Ham, Ramila Joshi, Pradip S Thakuri, Hossein Tavana

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Laeverin is Cell-Surface Target for Liquid-Phase Metastasizing Cancer Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Implicating the cholecystokinin B receptor in liver stem cell oncogenesis.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Monitoring and modulation of the tumor microenvironment for enhanced cancer modeling.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie L HamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA.
Ramila JoshiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA.
Pradip S ThakuriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA.
Hossein TavanaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA tavana@uakron.edu.
University of Akron · US

Funding

A Novel High Throughput Tumor Spheroid MicrotechnologyR21CA182333 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF AKRON · PI LUKER, GARY D, TAVANA, HOSSEIN · 2013 to 2014
$503k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumors are three-dimensional tissues where close contacts between cancer cells, intercellular interactions between cancer and stromal cells, adhesion of cancer cells to the extracellular matrix, and signaling of soluble factors modulate functions of cancer cells and their response to therapeutics. Three-dimensional cultures of cancer cells overcome limitations of traditionally used monolayer cultures and recreate essential characteristics of tumors such as spatial gradients of oxygen, growth factors, and metabolites and presence of necrotic, hypoxic, quiescent, and proliferative cells. As such, three-dimensional tumor models provide a valuable tool for cancer research and oncology drug discovery. Here, we describe different tumor models and primarily focus on a model known as tumor spheroid. We summarize different technologies of spheroid formation, and discuss the use of spheroids to address the influence of stromal fibroblasts and immune cells on cancer cells in tumor microenvironment, study cancer stem cells, and facilitate compound screening in the drug discovery process. We review major techniques for quantification of cellular responses to drugs and discuss challenges ahead to enable broad utility of tumor spheroids in research laboratories, integrate spheroid models into drug development and discovery pipeline, and use primary tumor cells for drug screening studies to realize personalized cancer treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCoculture TechniquesColorimetryDrug DiscoveryDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFibroblastsFluorescenceHumansLuminescent MeasurementsNeoplasms, ExperimentalNeoplastic Stem CellsSpheroids, CellularStromal CellsTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents3D tumor modelsanti-cancer drug discoverycancer cell spheroidscancer stem cellsco-culture spheroidstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID27072562
PMCPMC4950350
OpenAlexW2342311422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.