Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27072532›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2016

Changes in self-reported HIV testing during South Africa's 2010/2011 national testing campaign: gains and shortfalls.

Brendan Maughan-Brown, Neil Lloyd, Jacob Bor, Atheendar S Venkataramani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brendan Maughan-BrownSouthern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Neil LloydSouthern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jacob BorSouthern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Atheendar S VenkataramaniSouthern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Microenterprise to Improve Child Development in Households Exposed to HIVK23MH106362 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VENKATARAMANI, ATHEENDAR S. · 2015 to 2018
$738k
Economic, health, and behavioral dimensions of HIV treatment scale-upK01MH105320 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BOR, JACOB · 2015 to 2018
$613k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH105320NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH106362NIMH NIH HHS K23MH106362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHIV counselling and testing is critical to HIV prevention and treatment efforts. Mass campaigns may be an effective strategy to increase HIV testing in countries with generalized HIV epidemics. We assessed the self-reported uptake of HIV testing among individuals who had never previously tested for HIV, particularly those in high-risk populations, during the period of a national, multisector testing campaign in South Africa (April 2010 and June 2011).

designThis study was a prospective cohort study.

methodsWe analyzed data from two waves (2010/2011, n=16,893; 2012, n=18,707) of the National Income Dynamics Study, a nationally representative cohort that enabled prospective identification of first-time testers. We quantified the number of adults (15 years and older) testing for the first time nationally. To assess whether the campaign reached previously underserved populations, we examined changes in HIV testing coverage by age, gender, race and province sub-groups. We also estimated multivariable logistic regression models to identify socio-economic and demographic predictors of first-time testing.

resultsOverall, the proportion of adults ever tested for HIV increased from 43.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 41.48, 45.96) to 65.2% (95% CI: 63.28, 67.10) over the study period, with approximately 7.6 million (95% CI: 6,387,910; 8,782,986) first-time testers. Among black South Africans, the country's highest HIV prevalence sub-group, HIV testing coverage improved among poorer and healthier individuals, thus reducing gradients in testing by wealth and health. In contrast, HIV testing coverage remained lower for men, younger individuals and the less educated, indicating persistent if not widening disparities by gender, age and education. Large geographic disparities in coverage also remained as of 2012.

conclusionsMass provision of HIV testing services can be effective in increasing population coverage of HIV testing. The geographic and socio-economic disparities in programme impacts can help guide best practices for future efforts. These efforts should focus on hard-to-reach populations, including men and less-educated individuals.

Indexed as

Self ReportAdultBlack PeopleCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleProspective StudiesSouth AfricaTime FactorsYoung AdultdisparitiesHCTHIV/AIDSsocio-economic determinantssouthern Africatesting

Identifiers

PMID27072532
PMCPMC4829657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.