Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27072518›Full record

ArticleBone2016

Reference point indentation is insufficient for detecting alterations in traditional mechanical properties of bone under common experimental conditions.

John B Krege, Mohammad W Aref, Erin McNerny, Joseph M Wallace, Jason M Organ, Matthew R Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Identifying Bone Matrix Impairments in a Mouse Model of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) by Clinically Translatable Techniques.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. In Vivo Assessment of Cortical Bone Fragility.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Differences in sensitivity to microstructure between cyclic- and impact-based microindentation of human cortical bone.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John B KregeDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Mohammad W ArefDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Erin McNernyDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Joseph M WallaceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Jason M OrganDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Matthew R AllenDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States. Electronic address: matallen@iupui.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Indianapolis · US

Funding

Enhancing bone strength using combination drug therapyR01AR062002 · NIAMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ALLEN, MATTHEW R · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
Assessing and improving bone quality in chronic kidney diseaseF32DK108554 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MCNERNY, ERIN MARGARET BRONTE · 2015 to 2017
$170k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062002NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK108554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference point indentation (RPI) was developed as a novel method to assess mechanical properties of bone in vivo, yet it remains unclear what aspects of bone dictate changes/differences in RPI-based parameters. The main RPI parameter, indentation distance increase (IDI), has been proposed to be inversely related to the ability of bone to form/tolerate damage. The goal of this work was to explore the relationshipre-intervention RPI measurebetween RPI parameters and traditional mechanical properties under varying experimental conditions (drying and ashing bones to increase brittleness, demineralizing bones and soaking in raloxifene to decrease brittleness). Beams were machined from cadaveric bone, pre-tested with RPI, subjected to experimental manipulation, post-tested with RPI, and then subjected to four-point bending to failure. Drying and ashing significantly reduced RPI's IDI, as well as ultimate load (UL), and energy absorption measured from bending tests. Demineralization increased IDI with minimal change to bending properties. Ex vivo soaking in raloxifene had no effect on IDI but tended to enhance post-yield behavior at the structural level. These data challenge the paradigm of an inverse relationship between IDI and bone toughness, both through correlation analyses and in the individual experiments where divergent patterns of altered IDI and mechanical properties were noted. Based on these results, we conclude that RPI measurements alone, as compared to bending tests, are insufficient to reach conclusions regarding mechanical properties of bone. This proves problematic for the potential clinical use of RPI measurements in determining fracture risk for a single patient, as it is not currently clear that there is an IDI, or even a trend of IDI, that can determine clinically relevant changes in tissue properties that may contribute to whole bone fracture resistance.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesBone Demineralization TechniqueFemaleHumansMalePhysiologyRaloxifene HydrochlorideRaloxifene HydrochlorideBendingBiodentMaterial propertiesToughness

Identifiers

PMID27072518
PMCPMC4862890
OpenAlexW2332850238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.