Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27072326›Full record

ArticleCell calcium2016

Physiology of spontaneous [Ca(2+)]i oscillations in the isolated vasopressin and oxytocin neurones of the rat supraoptic nucleus.

Stepan Kortus, Chinnapaiyan Srinivasan, Oksana Forostyak, Yoichi Ueta, Eva Sykova, Alexandr Chvatal, Martin Zapotocky, Alexei Verkhratsky, Govindan Dayanithi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell calcium, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stepan KortusDepartment of Molecular Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Salmovska 1, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic.
Chinnapaiyan SrinivasanDepartment of Molecular Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Oksana ForostyakDepartment of Molecular Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neuroscience, Charles University, Second Medical Faculty, V Uvalu 84, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic.
Yoichi UetaDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan.
Eva SykovaDepartment of Neuroscience, Charles University, Second Medical Faculty, V Uvalu 84, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Alexandr ChvatalDepartment of Neuroscience, Charles University, Second Medical Faculty, V Uvalu 84, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin ZapotockyInstitute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Salmovska 1, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic.
Alexei VerkhratskyUniversity of Manchester, School of Biological Sciences, D.4417 Michael Smith Building, Oxford Road, M13 9PT Manchester, United Kingdom; Achucarro Center for Neuroscience, IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain; Department of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU and CIBERNED, Leioa, Spain; University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod 603022, Russia. Electronic address: Alexej.Verkhratsky@manchester.ac.uk.
Govindan DayanithiDepartment of Molecular Neurophysiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité de recherche U1198, Université Montpellier 2, 34095 Montpellier, France; Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Sorbonne, 75014 Paris, France. Electronic address: gdaya@univ-montp2.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnocellular vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT) neurones exhibit specific electrophysiological behaviour, synthesise AVP and OT peptides and secrete them into the neurohypophysial system in response to various physiological stimulations. The activity of these neurones is regulated by the very same peptides released either somato-dendritically or when applied to supraoptic nucleus (SON) preparations in vitro. The AVP and OT, secreted somato-dendritically (i.e. in the SON proper) act through specific autoreceptors, induce distinct Ca(2+) signals and regulate cellular events. Here, we demonstrate that about 70% of freshly isolated individual SON neurones from the adult non-transgenic or transgenic rats bearing AVP (AVP-eGFP) or OT (OT-mRFP1) markers, produce distinct spontaneous [Ca(2+)]i oscillations. In the neurones identified (through specific fluorescence), about 80% of AVP neurones and about 60% of OT neurones exhibited these oscillations. Exposure to AVP triggered [Ca(2+)]i oscillations in silent AVP neurones, or modified the oscillatory pattern in spontaneously active cells. Hyper- and hypo-osmotic stimuli (325 or 275 mOsmol/l) respectively intensified or inhibited spontaneous [Ca(2+)]i dynamics. In rats dehydrated for 3 or 5days almost 90% of neurones displayed spontaneous [Ca(2+)]i oscillations. More than 80% of OT-mRFP1 neurones from 3 to 6-day-lactating rats were oscillatory vs. about 44% (OT-mRFP1 neurones) in virgins. Together, these results unveil for the first time that both AVP and OT neurones maintain, via Ca(2+) signals, their remarkable intrinsic in vivo physiological properties in an isolated condition.

Indexed as

Calcium SignalingAnimalsCalciumDehydrationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMaleNeuronsOsmolar ConcentrationOxytocinRats, WistarSupraoptic NucleusVasopressinsCalciumenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsOxytocinVasopressinsCa(2+) oscillationsDehydrationElectrical activityEnhanced green fluorescence proteinFluorescence spectrofluorimetryFura-2Hyper-osmolarityHypo-osmolarityHypothalamusLactationMagnocellular neurosecretory cellsMonomeric red fluorescence proteinOsmoregulationOxytocinSkewnessSpationtemporal dynamicsSupraoptic nucleusTransgenic ratsVasopressin

Identifiers

PMID27072326
PMCPMC4969632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.