ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2016
Development and validation of a solid-phase extraction method using anion exchange sorbent for the analysis of cannabinoids in plasma and serum by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determination of ΔForensic toxicology · 2024Article
- Marijuana toxicosis in 2 donkeys.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2022Article
- Investigation of phase II metabolism of 11-hydroxy-Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and metabolite verification by chemical synthesis of 11-hydroxy-Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-glucuronide.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- Development and validation of a Fast gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method for the determination of cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2018Article
- 8β-OH-THC and 8β,11-diOH-THC-minor metabolites with major informative value?International journal of legal medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this work was to develop and validate a solid-phase extraction (SPE) method for the analysis of cannabinoids with emphasis on a very extensive and effective matrix reduction in order to ensure constant good results in selectivity and sensitivity regardless of the applied measuring technology. This was obtained by the use of an anion exchange sorbent (AXS) and the purposive ionic interaction between matrix components and this sorbent material. In a first step, the neutral cannabinoids ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 11-hydroxy-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-THC) were eluted, leaving 11-nor-9-carboxy-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) and the main interfering matrix components bound to the AXS. In a second step, exploiting differences in pH and polarity, it was possible to separate matrix components and THC-COOH, thereby yielding a clean elution of THC-COOH into the same collecting tube as THC and 11-OH-THC. Even when using a simple measuring technology like gas chromatography with single quadrupole mass spectrometry, this two-step elution allows for an obvious decrease in number and intensity of matrix interference in the chromatogram. Hence, in both plasma and serum, the AXS extracts resulted in very good selectivity. Limits of detection and limits of quantification were below 0.25 and 0.35 ng/mL for the neutral cannabinoids in both matrices, 2.0 and 3.0 ng/mL in plasma and 1.6 and 3.3 ng/mL in serum for THC-COOH. The recoveries were ≥79.8 % for all analytes. Interday and intraday imprecisions ranged from 0.8 to 6.1 % relative standard deviation, and accuracy bias ranged from -12.6 to 3.6 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.