Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27071986›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2016

A pilot study to assess bacterial and toxin reduction in patients with Clostridium difficile infection given fidaxomicin or vancomycin.

Abrar K Thabit, M Jahangir Alam, Mohammed Khaleduzzaman, Kevin W Garey, David P Nicolau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparative effectiveness of different therapies forThe Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025
    Article
  3. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  4. Fidaxomicin for the Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Immune response againstTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Management of adult Clostridium difficile digestive contaminations: a literature review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abrar K ThabitCenter for Anti-infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
M Jahangir AlamUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Mohammed KhaleduzzamanUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
Kevin W GareyUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, USA.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA. david.nicolau@hhchealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the effect of fidaxomicin and vancomycin on Clostridium difficile toxins and correlation with clinical and microbiologic outcomes.

methodsHospitalized patients with C. difficile infection were randomly assigned a 10-day course of fidaxomicin or vancomycin. Stool samples collected at baseline (day 0), mid-therapy (days 3-5), end of therapy (days 10-13) and follow-up (days 19-38) were assessed for quantity of toxins A and B as well as spore and vegetative cells counts. Correlation of toxins concentrations with microbiologic and clinical findings were evaluated.

resultsAmong 34 patients 12 had detectable toxin concentrations at baseline seven were randomized to fidaxomicin and five to vancomycin. Overall both fidaxomicin and vancomycin resulted in drop of both toxins concentrations by midpoint of therapy. The drop in toxin A concentrations was maintained up to the follow-up period with fidaxomicin but not with vancomycin even in patients who developed recurrence. Patients who developed recurrence in the fidaxomicin group had lower concentrations of toxin B versus the recurrence patient of vancomycin group. Presence of vegetative cells and spores was significantly linked with high toxin A (P = 0.003 and <0.001 respectively) and toxin B (P = 0.007 and <0.001 respectively) concentrations across time points. Toxin B concentrations but not A significantly correlated with stool consistency (P < 0.001) and frequency (P = 0.05).

conclusionsFidaxomicin was associated with sustained reduction of both toxins up to 30 days post therapy versus vancomycin. Multiple clinical or microbiologic observations were correlated with toxin A or B concentrations.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsFecesFemaleFidaxomicinHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsVancomycinAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsFidaxomicinVancomycinClostridium difficile toxinsFidaxomicinVancomycinVegetative cells

Identifiers

PMID27071986
PMCPMC4830079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.