Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27071845›Full record

ArticleHeredity2016

The genetic contribution to sex determination and number of sex chromosomes vary among populations of common frogs (Rana temporaria).

N Rodrigues, Y Vuille, A Brelsford, J Merilä, N Perrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Homology in Sex Determination in Two Distant Spiny Frogs,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution of master sex determiners: TGF-β signalling pathways at regulatory crossroads.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Demographic and genetic consequences of disturbed sex determination.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  15. Climate-driven shifts in adult sex ratios via sex reversals: the type of sex determination matters.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Using conventionalPeerJ · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N RodriguesDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Y VuilleDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
A BrelsfordDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J MeriläEcological Genetics Research Unit, Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
N PerrinDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The patterns of sex determination and sex differentiation have been shown to differ among geographic populations of common frogs. Notably, the association between phenotypic sex and linkage group 2 (LG2) has been found to be perfect in a northern Swedish population, but weak and variable among families in a southern one. By analyzing these populations with markers from other linkage groups, we bring two new insights: (1) the variance in phenotypic sex not accounted for by LG2 in the southern population could not be assigned to genetic factors on other linkage groups, suggesting an epigenetic component to sex determination; (2) a second linkage group (LG7) was found to co-segregate with sex and LG2 in the northern population. Given the very short timeframe since post-glacial colonization (in the order of 1000 generations) and its seemingly localized distribution, this neo-sex chromosome system might be the youngest one described so far. It does not result from a fusion, but more likely from a reciprocal translocation between the original Y chromosome (LG2) and an autosome (LG7), causing their co-segregation during male meiosis. By generating a strict linkage between several important genes from the sex-determination cascade (Dmrt1, Amh and Amhr2), this neo-sex chromosome possibly contributes to the 'differentiated sex race' syndrome (strictly genetic sex determination and early gonadal development) that characterizes this northern population.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationSex ChromosomesSex Determination ProcessesAnimalsFemaleGenetic LinkageGenetic LociGenetic VariationHaplotypesMalePrincipal Component AnalysisRana temporariaRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID27071845
PMCPMC4901354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.