ArticleBMC research notes2016
An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue.
Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microablative fractional radiofrequency for sexual dysfunction and vaginal Trophism: A randomized clinical trial.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2023Trial
- Development of Mucoadhesive Nanofiber as an Alternate Therapeutic Regimen for Subclinical Endometritis in Cattle.Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antimicrobial Activity of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Quantitative interpretation models for targeted next-generation sequencing in lower respiratory tract infections: a multicenter prospective study.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Phenotypic and genomic characterization of tigecycline-insensitiveMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Post-Mortem Detection and Visualization of Mimivirus Reactivation in Fatal Viral Pneumonia.Viruses · 2026Article
- Article
- Selective anticancer activity ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- A multi-omics approach exploring the gut-liver axis following combined radiation exposure and burn injury in a Sinclair minipig model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prenatal methamphetamine exposure induces oxidative stress and apoptosis in the ovaries of rat offspring.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- The dimethyloxalylglycine-functionalized nanofibers forMaterials today. Bio · 2025Article
- An antibiotic-free antimicrobial combination of bacteriocins and a peptidoglycan hydrolase:Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Contamination of meat and its products byOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
- An Antimicrobial Blue Light Prototype Device Controls Infected Wounds in a Preclinical Porcine Model.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Techniques for Helicobacter pylori Infection: Insights for Effective Therapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- A multi-strain human skin microbiome model provides a testbed for disease modeling.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025Article
- Bacterial Leakage Testing in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Models, and Clinical Relevance.Scientifica · 2025Review
- The promoting role of aluminum oxide nanoparticles in enhancingOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial infections are a common clinical problem in both acute and chronic wounds. With growing concerns over antibiotic resistance, treatment of bacterial infections should only occur after positive diagnosis. Currently, diagnosis is delayed due to lengthy culturing methods which may also fail to identify the presence of bacteria. While newer costly bacterial identification methods are being explored, a simple and inexpensive diagnostic tool would aid in immediate and accurate treatments for bacterial infections. Histologically, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Gram stains have been employed, but are far from optimal when analyzing tissue samples due to non-specific staining. The goal of the current study was to develop a modification of the Gram stain that enhances the contrast between bacteria and host tissue.
findingsA modified Gram stain was developed and tested as an alternative to Gram stain that improves the contrast between Gram positive bacteria, Gram negative bacteria and host tissue. Initially, clinically relevant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were visualized in vitro and in biopsies of infected, porcine burns using routine Gram stain, and immunohistochemistry techniques involving bacterial strain-specific fluorescent antibodies as validation tools. H&E and Gram stain of serial biopsy sections were then compared to a modification of the Gram stain incorporating a counterstain that highlights collagen found in tissue. The modified Gram stain clearly identified both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria, and when compared to H&E or Gram stain alone provided excellent contrast between bacteria and non-viable burn eschar. Moreover, when applied to surgical biopsies from patients that underwent burn debridement this technique was able to clearly detect bacterial morphology within host tissue.
conclusionsWe describe a modification of the Gram stain that provides improved contrast of Gram positive and Gram negative microorganisms within host tissue. The samples used in this study demonstrate that this staining technique has laboratory and clinical applicability. This modification only adds minutes to traditional Gram stain with reusable reagents, and results in a cost- and time-efficient technique for identifying bacteria in any clinical biopsy containing connective tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.