Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27071689›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2016

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: 20 years of experience.

Daniela Currò, Gianluigi Mancardi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Advances in clinical neurology through the journal "Neurological Sciences" (2015-2016).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela CurròDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova and IRCCS AOU San Martino IST, Largo Paolo Daneo 3, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Gianluigi MancardiDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova and IRCCS AOU San Martino IST, Largo Paolo Daneo 3, 16132, Genoa, Italy. glmancardi@neurologia.unige.it.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intense immunosuppression followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been widely used in the last 20 years for the treatment of aggressive forms of autoimmune disorders, especially multiple sclerosis (MS). All clinical studies, although small and uncontrolled, demonstrate a great efficacy of this procedure in halting inflammation and disease activity, even in those patients affected by "malignant forms" of MS. The long-term follow-up has also revealed the possible maintenance of positive results in the course of time, and this evidence is supported by immunological data that suggest the possibility of a resetting of the immune system after AHSCT. The safety of AHSCT has improved in the last years, but the transplant related mortality is still nowadays of about 1-2 %, pointing out that a careful selection of patients to submit to AHSCT is mandatory. The long clinical experience allowed to identify the ideal candidate: a young patient, with a short disease duration, with recurring and disabling relapses and the presence of inflammatory activity on brain magnetic resonance scans, unresponsive to approved therapies. A large, randomized clinical study comparing AHSCT with the best approved therapies is still necessary to confirm the role of transplantation in MS treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMultiple SclerosisNeuroimagingTreatment OutcomeAutologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantationMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID27071689
OpenAlexW2340386614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.