Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27071532›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2016

Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis for strain discrimination of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli.

Chris Timmons, Eija Trees, Efrain M Ribot, Peter Gerner-Smidt, Patti LaFon, Sung Im, Li Maria Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Rapid and Simple UniversalApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chris TimmonsNational Institute for Microbial Forensics & Food and Agricultural Biosecurity, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK 74078, United States.
Eija TreesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, United States.
Efrain M RibotCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, United States.
Peter Gerner-SmidtCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, United States.
Patti LaFonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, United States.
Sung ImCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, United States.
Li Maria MaNational Institute for Microbial Forensics & Food and Agricultural Biosecurity, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK 74078, United States. Electronic address: li.ma@okstate.edu.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are foodborne pathogens of growing concern worldwide that have been associated with several recent multistate and multinational outbreaks of foodborne illness. Rapid and sensitive molecular-based bacterial strain discrimination methods are critical for timely outbreak identification and contaminated food source traceback. One such method, multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), is being used with increasing frequency in foodborne illness outbreak investigations to augment the current gold standard bacterial subtyping technique, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The objective of this study was to develop a MLVA assay for intra- and inter-serogroup discrimination of six major non-O157 STEC serogroups-O26, O111, O103, O121, O45, and O145-and perform a preliminary internal validation of the method on a limited number of clinical isolates. The resultant MLVA scheme consists of ten variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) loci amplified in three multiplex PCR reactions. Sixty-five unique MLVA types were obtained among 84 clinical non-O157 STEC strains comprised of geographically diverse sporadic and outbreak related isolates. Compared to PFGE, the developed MLVA scheme allowed similar discrimination among serogroups O26, O111, O103, and O121 but not among O145 and O45. To more fully compare the discriminatory power of this preliminary MLVA method to PFGE and to determine its epidemiological congruence, a thorough internal and external validation needs to be performed on a carefully selected large panel of strains, including multiple isolates from single outbreaks.

Indexed as

Minisatellite RepeatsBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansMolecular TypingSerogroupShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliShiga ToxinDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsShiga ToxinEscherichia coli O157MLVANon-O157 STECOutbreak investigationStrain discrimination

Identifiers

PMID27071532
PMCPMC6553613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.