Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27071073›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Top-Down Effect of Direct Current Stimulation on the Nociceptive Response of Rats.

Luiz Fabio Dimov, Adriano Cardozo Franciosi, Ana Carolina Pinheiro Campos, André Russowsky Brunoni, Rosana Lima Pagano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Progress in pain mechanisms and management.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luiz Fabio DimovLaboratory of Neuromodulation and Experimental Pain, Hospital Sírio Libanês, Rua Prof Daher Cutait, 69, Sao Paulo, SP, 01308-060, Brazil.
Adriano Cardozo FranciosiLaboratory of Neuromodulation and Experimental Pain, Hospital Sírio Libanês, Rua Prof Daher Cutait, 69, Sao Paulo, SP, 01308-060, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Pinheiro CamposLaboratory of Neuromodulation and Experimental Pain, Hospital Sírio Libanês, Rua Prof Daher Cutait, 69, Sao Paulo, SP, 01308-060, Brazil.
André Russowsky BrunoniService of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of University of São Paulo, Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, Rua Doutor Ovidio Pires de Campos, 785, Sao Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Rosana Lima PaganoLaboratory of Neuromodulation and Experimental Pain, Hospital Sírio Libanês, Rua Prof Daher Cutait, 69, Sao Paulo, SP, 01308-060, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5351-6575
Hospital Sírio-Libanês · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging, noninvasive technique of neurostimulation for treating pain. However, the mechanisms and pathways involved in its analgesic effects are poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the effects of direct current stimulation (DCS) on thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds and on the activation of the midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) and the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (DHSC) in rats; these central nervous system areas are associated with pain processing. Male Wistar rats underwent cathodal DCS of the motor cortex and, while still under stimulation, were evaluated using tail-flick and paw pressure nociceptive tests. Sham stimulation and naive rats were used as controls. We used a randomized design; the assays were not blinded to the experimenter. Immunoreactivity of the early growth response gene 1 (Egr-1), which is a marker of neuronal activation, was evaluated in the PAG and DHSC, and enkephalin immunoreactivity was evaluated in the DHSC. DCS did not change the thermal nociceptive threshold; however, it increased the mechanical nociceptive threshold of both hind paws compared with that of controls, characterizing a topographical effect. DCS decreased the Egr-1 labeling in the PAG and DHSC as well as the immunoreactivity of spinal enkephalin. Altogether, the data suggest that DCS disinhibits the midbrain descending analgesic pathway, consequently inhibiting spinal nociceptive neurons and causing an increase in the nociceptive threshold. This study reinforces the idea that the motor cortex participates in the neurocircuitry that is involved in analgesia and further clarifies the mechanisms of action of tDCS in pain treatment.

Indexed as

NociceptionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAnimalsElectrodesHyperalgesiaMalePeriaqueductal GrayPosterior Horn CellsRatsRats, Wistar

Identifiers

PMID27071073
PMCPMC4829148
OpenAlexW2339775526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.