Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27071066›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2016

Incidence and Etiology of Potentially Preventable ICU Readmissions.

Mohammed J Al-Jaghbeer, Seema S Tekwani, Scott R Gunn, Jeremy M Kahn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Navigating Discharges from Intensive Care Unit to Ward.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed J Al-Jaghbeer1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC.2Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.3Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.4Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA.
Seema S Tekwani
Scott R Gunn
Jeremy M Kahn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe rate of unplanned ICU readmissions is often considered a measure of hospital performance. However, the degree to which these readmissions are preventable and the causes of preventable readmissions are unknown, creating uncertainty about the feasibility and value of reducing ICU readmission rates. To inform this issue, we sought to determine the frequency and underlying causes of potentially preventable ICU readmissions.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingUrban, academic medical center in the mid-Atlantic United States. PATIENTS: Adult patients discharged alive from their first ICU admission with an unplanned readmission within 48 hours of discharge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsEach patient's medical chart was reviewed by two independent investigators who rated each readmission's preventability according to standardized scale and assessed the etiology of both preventable and nonpreventable readmissions. We assessed concordance between raters using the κ statistic and resolved disagreements through iterative discussion. Of 136 readmissions in the final analysis, 16 (11.8%; 95% CI, 6.9-18.4) were considered preventable and 120 (88.2%; 95% CI, 81.5-93.1) were considered nonpreventable. Of nonpreventable readmissions, 67 were due to a new clinical problem and 53 were due to an existing clinical problem. Among preventable readmissions, six were attributable to system errors, six were attributable to management errors, two were attributable to procedural events, one was attributable to a diagnostic error, and one was attributable to a medication error. Compared to nonpreventable readmissions, preventable readmissions tended to have shorter index ICU lengths of stay (2 vs 3 d; p = 0.05) and a shorter duration of time on the ward prior to readmission (16.6 vs 23.6 hr; p = 0.05).

conclusionsThe majority of early ICU readmissions are nonpreventable, raising important concerns about ICU readmission rates as a measure of hospital performance.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAdultAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.