Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27070818›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Using an Inbred Horse Breed in a High Density Genome-Wide Scan for Genetic Risk Factors of Insect Bite Hypersensitivity (IBH).

Brandon D Velie, Merina Shrestha, Liesbeth Franҫois, Anouk Schurink, Yohannes G Tesfayonas, Anneleen Stinckens, Sarah Blott, Bart J Ducro, Sofia Mikko, Ruth Thomas and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Brandon D VelieDepartment of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Merina ShresthaDepartment of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Liesbeth FranҫoisResearch Group Livestock Genetics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anouk SchurinkAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Yohannes G TesfayonasDepartment of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anneleen StinckensResearch Group Livestock Genetics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sarah BlottSchool of Veterinary Medicine & Science, University of Nottingham, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
Bart J DucroAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Sofia MikkoDepartment of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ruth ThomasExmoor Pony Society, Cullompton, United Kingdom.
June E SwinburneAnimal DNA Diagnostics Ltd, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Marie SundqvistÖstra Greda Research Group, Borgholm, Sweden.
Susanne ErikssonDepartment of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nadine BuysResearch Group Livestock Genetics, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gabriella LindgrenDepartment of Animal Breeding & Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEKU Leuven · BEWageningen University & Research · NLAnimal Health Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While susceptibility to hypersensitive reactions is a common problem amongst humans and animals alike, the population structure of certain animal species and breeds provides a more advantageous route to better understanding the biology underpinning these conditions. The current study uses Exmoor ponies, a highly inbred breed of horse known to frequently suffer from insect bite hypersensitivity, to identify genomic regions associated with a type I and type IV hypersensitive reaction. A total of 110 cases and 170 controls were genotyped on the 670K Axiom Equine Genotyping Array. Quality control resulted in 452,457 SNPs and 268 individuals being tested for association. Genome-wide association analyses were performed using the GenABEL package in R and resulted in the identification of two regions of interest on Chromosome 8. The first region contained the most significant SNP identified, which was located in an intron of the DCC netrin 1 receptor gene. The second region identified contained multiple top SNPs and encompassed the PIGN, KIAA1468, TNFRSF11A, ZCCHC2, and PHLPP1 genes. Although additional studies will be needed to validate the importance of these regions in horses and the relevance of these regions in other species, the knowledge gained from the current study has the potential to be a step forward in unraveling the complex nature of hypersensitive reactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleGenes, DCCGenome-Wide Association StudyHorse DiseasesHorsesHypersensitivityInbreedingInsect Bites and StingsLinkage DisequilibriumMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsSkin Diseases, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID27070818
PMCPMC4829256
OpenAlexW2336397920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.