Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27070727›Full record

Trial reportSubstance use & misuse2016

Does a Brief Motivational Intervention Reduce Frequency of Pregaming in Mandated Students?

Brian Borsari, Jennifer E Merrill, Ali Yurasek, Mary Beth Miller, Kate B Carey

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Substance use & misuse, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. A mobile-based pregaming drinking prevention intervention for college students: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian Borsaria Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences Service , Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Providence , Rhode Island , USA.
Jennifer E Merrillb Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University, Providence , Rhode Island , USA.
Ali Yurasekb Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University, Providence , Rhode Island , USA.
Mary Beth Millerb Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University, Providence , Rhode Island , USA.
Kate B Careyb Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University, Providence , Rhode Island , USA.
Brown University · US

Funding

ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
Stepped Care for Mandated College StudentsR01AA015518 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BORSARI, BRIAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
Within-Session Mechanisms of Behavior Change in At-Risk College StudentsR01AA017427 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BORSARI, BRIAN · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
Real-Time Evaluations of Alcohol Consequences and Subsequent DrinkingK01AA022938 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MERRILL, JENNIFER ELIZABETH · 2014 to 2018
$904k
Sequential and Component Analyses of MI Mechanisms with College DrinkersR01AA017874 · NIAAA · CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSP (KANSAS CITY, MO) · PI APODACA, TIMOTHY R · 2009 to 2011
$726k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA022938NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015518NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017427NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017874NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregaming, also known as frontloading or predrinking, is a common but risky drinking behavior among college students. However, little is known about the way in which a brief motivational intervention (BMI) addressing general alcohol use and consequences may impact pregaming frequency.

objectivesThis study examined whether mandated students reduced frequency of pregaming following a BMI when pregaming was spontaneously discussed and whether gender moderated these effects.

methodsParticipants (n = 269, 32% female) were mandated college students who had received a campus-based alcohol citation and continued to exhibit risky alcohol use six weeks after receiving a brief advice session. Participants were randomized to a brief motivational intervention (BMI, n = 145) or assessment only (AO, n = 124) and completed follow-up assessments at 3, 6, and 9 months postintervention. Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) was used to examine both between-person (Level 2) effects (i.e., condition) and within-person (Level 1) effects (i.e., time) on pregaming frequency. Analyses examining discussions of pregaming within the BMI were conducted using a subsample of the BMI sessions which had been transcribed (n = 121).

resultsParticipants in the BMI group did not significantly reduce the frequency of pregaming compared to those in the AO group, even when pregaming was explicitly discussed during the BMI. Moreover, the BMI was equally ineffective at reducing pregaming frequency for both males and females. Conclusion/Importance: Pregaming frequency appears to be resistant to conventional intervention efforts, but recent research suggests several innovative strategies for addressing pregaming in the college student population.

Indexed as

MotivationAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHumansMaleMandatory ProgramsStudentsUniversitiesalcoholbrief interventioncollege studentsmandatedPregaming

Identifiers

PMID27070727
PMCPMC4884148
OpenAlexW2338415511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.