Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27070654›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Advice about Work-Related Issues to Peers and Employers from Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

Carolyn S Dewa, Lucy Trojanowski, Sietske J Tamminga, Jolie Ringash, Maurene McQuestion, Jeffrey S Hoch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The prevalence and determinants of return to work in head and neck cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Employers' experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017
    Article
  9. Returning to work: The cancer survivor's transformational journey of adjustment and coping.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Carolyn S DewaCentre for Research on Employment and Workplace Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lucy TrojanowskiCentre for Research on Employment and Workplace Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sietske J TammingaCoronel Institute of Occupational Health Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jolie RingashPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maurene McQuestionPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey S HochInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 86895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this exploratory and descriptive study is to contribute to the sparse return-to-work literature on head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. Interview participants were asked to reflect upon their work-related experience with cancer by answering two specific questions: (1) What advice would you give someone who has been newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer? (2) What advice would you give to employers of these people?

methodsData were gathered through 10 individual semi-structured in-depth interviews with HNC clinic patients at a regional cancer center's head and neck clinic in Ontario, Canada. A constant comparative method of theme development was used. Codes identified in and derived from the data were discussed by research team members until consensus was reached. Codes with similar characteristics were grouped together and used to develop overarching themes.

resultsWork-related advice for peers focused on personal self-care and interactions within workplaces. Work-related advice to employers focused on demonstrating basic human values as well as the importance of communication. DISCUSSION: The study results suggest HNC clinic patients should be proactive with employers and help to set reasonable expectations and provide a realistic plan for work to be successfully completed. HNC clinic patients should develop communication skills to effectively disclose their cancer and treatment to employers.

conclusionsIn this exploratory study, HNC clinic patients' advice was solution-focused underscoring the importance of self-care and pro-active communication and planning with employers. Employers were advised to demonstrate core human values throughout all phases of the work disability episode beginning at diagnosis.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsReturn to WorkAdultAgedCommunicationEmploymentFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOccupationsOntarioPeer GroupSelf CareSick Leave

Identifiers

PMID27070654
PMCPMC4829226
OpenAlexW2340896512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.