Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27070633›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Cross Sectional Association between Spatially Measured Walking Bouts and Neighborhood Walkability.

Liang-Dar Hwang, Philip M Hurvitz, Glen E Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evidence synthesis - Where are children and adults physically active and sedentary? - a rapid review of location-based studies.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liang-Dar HwangInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Nutritional Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. liangdar@uw.edu.
Philip M HurvitzDepartment of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. phurvitz@u.washington.edu.
Glen E DuncanNutrition & Exercise Physiology Program, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA. glen.duncan@wsu.edu.

Funding

TWINStudy of Environment, Lifestyle Behaviors, and HealthR01AG042176 · NIA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DUNCAN, GLEN E · 2011 to 2014
$2.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042176NIA NIH HHS R01AG042176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walking is the most popular choice of aerobic physical activity to improve health among U.S. adults. Physical characteristics of the home neighborhood can facilitate or hinder walking. The purpose of this study was to quantify neighborhood walking, using objective methods and to examine the association between counts of walking bouts in the home neighborhood and neighborhood walkability. This was a cross-sectional study of 106 adults who wore accelerometers and GPS devices for two weeks. Walking was quantified within 1, 2, and 3 km Euclidean (straight-line) and network buffers around the geocoded home location. Walkability was estimated using a commercially available index. Walking bout counts increased with buffer size and were associated with walkability, regardless of buffer type or size (p < 0.001). Quantification of walking bouts within (and outside) of pre-defined neighborhood buffers of different sizes and types allowed for the specification of walking locations to better describe and elucidate walking behaviors. These data support the concept that neighborhood characteristics can influence walking among adults.

Indexed as

Environment DesignResidence CharacteristicsWalkingAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultGeographic Information Systemsresidence characteristicstwinswalking

Identifiers

PMID27070633
PMCPMC4847074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.