Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27070578›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Challenging Density Functional Theory Calculations with Hemes and Porphyrins.

Sam P de Visser, Martin J Stillman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metal-organic frameworks as OChemical science · 2022
    Review
  4. Bioengineering of Cytochrome P450 OleTMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sam P de VisserManchester Institute of Biotechnology and School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, the University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK. sam.devisser@manchester.ac.uk.
Martin J StillmanDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada. martin.stillman@uwo.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we review recent advances in computational chemistry and specifically focus on the chemical description of heme proteins and synthetic porphyrins that act as both mimics of natural processes and technological uses. These are challenging biochemical systems involved in electron transfer as well as biocatalysis processes. In recent years computational tools have improved considerably and now can reproduce experimental spectroscopic and reactivity studies within a reasonable error margin (several kcal·mol(-1)). This paper gives recent examples from our groups, where we investigated heme and synthetic metal-porphyrin systems. The four case studies highlight how computational modelling can correctly reproduce experimental product distributions, predicted reactivity trends and guide interpretation of electronic structures of complex systems. The case studies focus on the calculations of a variety of spectroscopic features of porphyrins and show how computational modelling gives important insight that explains the experimental spectra and can lead to the design of porphyrins with tuned properties.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytochrome-c PeroxidaseCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemElectronsElectron Transport Complex IVHemeHemeproteinsHemoglobin AHumansMetalloporphyrinsModels, MolecularPorphyrinsProtein ConformationQuantum TheoryCytochrome-c PeroxidaseCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemElectron Transport Complex IVHemeHemeproteinsHemoglobin AMetalloporphyrinsPorphyrinschlorophyllsDFTenzyme mechanismGa(III)PPIXMCD spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID27070578
PMCPMC4848975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.