ArticleVirulence2016
Potency of a human monoclonal antibody to diphtheria toxin relative to equine diphtheria anti-toxin in a guinea pig intoxication model.
Article in Virulence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075175 (A Phase 1 Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Human Monoclonal Antibody), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1 Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Human Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) S315 Against Diphtheria Toxin
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diphtheria Antitoxin Production and Procurement Practices and Challenges.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Diphtheria antitoxin treatment: from pioneer to neglected.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2025Review
- Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Infectious Diseases.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2025Review
- Passive Immunisation in the Treatment of Infectious Diseases Related to Highly Potent Bacterial Toxins.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Neutralizing anti-diphtheria toxin scFv produced by phage display.Biotechnology letters · 2024Article
- Severe diphtheria with neurologic and myocardial involvement in a Swedish patient: a case report.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Characterization of serum anti-diphtheria antibody activity following administration of equine anti-toxin for suspected diphtheria.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Article
- Development of human monoclonal antibodies to diphtheria toxin: A solution for the increasing lack of equine DAT for therapeutic use?Virulence · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prompt administration of anti-toxin reduces mortality following Corynebacterium diphtheriae infection. Current treatment relies upon equine diphtheria anti-toxin (DAT), with a 10% risk of serum sickness and rarely anaphylaxis. The global DAT supply is extremely limited; most manufacturers have ceased production. S315 is a neutralizing human IgG1 monoclonal antibody to diphtheria toxin that may provide a safe and effective alternative to equine DAT and address critical supply issues. To guide dose selection for IND-enabling pharmacology and toxicology studies, we dose-ranged S315 and DAT in a guinea pig model of diphtheria intoxication based on the NIH Minimum Requirements potency assay. Animals received a single injection of antibody premixed with toxin, were monitored for 30 days, and assigned a numeric score for clinical signs of disease. Animals receiving ≥ 27.5 µg of S315 or ≥ 1.75 IU of DAT survived whereas animals receiving ≤ 22.5 µg of S315 or ≤ 1.25 IU of DAT died, yielding a potency estimate of 17 µg S315/IU DAT (95% CI 16-21) for an endpoint of survival. Because some surviving animals exhibited transient limb weakness, likely a systemic sign of toxicity, DAT and S315 doses required to prevent hind limb paralysis were also determined, yielding a relative potency of 48 µg/IU (95% CI 38-59) for this alternate endpoint. To support advancement of S315 into clinical trials, potency estimates will be used to evaluate the efficacy of S315 versus DAT in an animal model with antibody administration after toxin exposure, more closely modeling anti-toxin therapy in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.