Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27070092›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Characterization of Lgr5+ progenitor cell transcriptomes in the apical and basal turns of the mouse cochlea.

Muhammad Waqas, Luo Guo, Shasha Zhang, Yan Chen, Xiaoli Zhang, Lei Wang, Mingliang Tang, Haibo Shi, Phillip I Bird, Huawei Li and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AAV-regulatedMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Single-Cell Sequencing Applications in the Inner Ear.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad WaqasState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Institute of Life Sciences, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Luo GuoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hearing Research Institute, Affiliated Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shasha ZhangState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Institute of Life Sciences, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yan ChenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hearing Research Institute, Affiliated Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoli ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Lei WangInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mingliang TangState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Institute of Life Sciences, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Haibo ShiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Phillip I BirdDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Huawei LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hearing Research Institute, Affiliated Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Renjie ChaiState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Institute of Life Sciences, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CNSoutheast University · CNFudan University · CNMonash University · AUNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lgr5+ supporting cells (SCs) are enriched hair cell (HC) progenitors in the cochlea, and several studies have shown a difference in the proliferation and HC regeneration ability of SCs between the apical and basal turns. However, the detailed differences between the transcriptomes of the apical and basal Lgr5+ SCs have not yet been investigated. We found that when isolated by FACS, Lgr5+ cells from the apex generated significantly more HCs and had significantly higher proliferation and mitotic HC regeneration ability compared to those from the base. Next, we used microarray analysis to determine the transcriptome expression profiles of Lgr5+ progenitors from the apex and the base. We first analyzed the genes that were enriched and differentially expressed in Lgr5+ progenitors from the apex and the base. Then we analyzed the cell cycle genes and the transcription factors that might regulate the proliferation and differentiation of Lgr5+ progenitors. Lastly, to further analyze the role of differentially expressed genes and to gain an overall view of the gene network in cochlear HC regeneration, we created a protein-protein interaction network. Our datasets suggest the possible genes that might regulate the proliferation and HC regeneration ability of Lgr5+ progenitors, and these genes might provide new therapeutic targets for HC regeneration in the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCochleaFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHair Cells, AuditoryMaleMiceMice, TransgenicReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRegenerationStem CellsTranscriptomeLgr5 protein, mouseReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledcochleaLgr5proliferationregenerationWnt signaling

Identifiers

PMID27070092
PMCPMC5173047
OpenAlexW2331733158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.