Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27070088›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

The novel tankyrase inhibitor (AZ1366) enhances irinotecan activity in tumors that exhibit elevated tankyrase and irinotecan resistance.

Kevin S Quackenbush, Stacey Bagby, Wai Meng Tai, Wells A Messersmith, Anna Schreiber, Justin Greene, Jihye Kim, Guoliang Wang, Alicia Purkey, Todd M Pitts and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Signaling pathways and their potential therapeutic utility in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. β-Catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022
    Review
  8. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cancers and targeted therapies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021
    Review
  9. Are Wnt/β-Catenin and PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 Distinct Pathways in Colorectal Cancer?Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. WNT Signaling in Cardiac and Vascular Disease.Pharmacological reviews · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. FH535 Suppresses Osteosarcoma GrowthFrontiers in pharmacology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin S QuackenbushDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Stacey BagbyDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Wai Meng TaiDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Wells A MessersmithDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Anna SchreiberDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Justin GreeneDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Jihye KimDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Guoliang WangDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Alicia PurkeyDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Todd M PittsDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Anna NguyenDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Dexiang GaoDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Patrick BlatchfordDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Anna CapassoDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Alwin G SchullerAstraZeneca R & D Boston, Massachusetts, Waltham, Massachusetts, MA, USA.
S Gail EckhardtDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
John J ArcaroliDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USAstraZeneca (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysregulation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway has been implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) development as well as incipient stages of malignant transformation. In this study, we investigated the antitumor effects of AZ1366 (a novel tankyrase inhibitor) as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan in our patient derived CRC explant xenograft models.

resultsSix out of 18 CRC explants displayed a significant growth reduction to AZ1366. There was one CRC explant (CRC040) that reached the threshold of sensitivity (TGII ≤ 20%) in this study. In addition, the combination of AZ1366 + irinotecan demonstrated efficacy in 4 out of 18 CRC explants. Treatment effects on the WNT pathway revealed that tankyrase inhibition was ineffective at reducing WNT dependent signaling. However, the anti-tumor effects observed in this study were likely a result of alternative tankyrase effects whereby tankyrase inhibition reduced NuMA levels. MATERIALS AND

methodsEighteen CRC explants were treated with AZ1366 single agent or in combination for 28 days and treatment responses were assessed. Pharmacokinetic (AZ1366 drug concentrations) and pharmacodynamic effects (Axin2 levels) were investigated over 48 hours. Immunohistochemistry of nuclear β-catenin levels as well as western blot was employed to examine the treatment effects on the WNT pathway as well as NuMA.

conclusionsCombination AZ1366 and irinotecan achieved greater anti-tumor effects compared to monotherapy. Activity was limited to CRC explants that displayed irinotecan resistance and increased protein levels of tankyrase and NuMA.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAxin ProteinCamptothecinColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHumansIrinotecanMaleMiceMice, NudeMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAXIN2 protein, humanAxin ProteinCamptothecinEnzyme InhibitorsIrinotecanTankyrasesTNKS protein, humanCRCIRNNuMAPDTXWNT

Identifiers

PMID27070088
PMCPMC5053726
OpenAlexW2330572103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.