Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069856›Full record

ArticleKidney research and clinical practice2016

Clinical utility of far-infrared therapy for improvement of vascular access blood flow and pain control in hemodialysis patients.

Soo Jeong Choi, Eun Hee Cho, Hye Min Jo, Changwook Min, Young Sok Ji, Moo Yong Park, Jin Kuk Kim, Seung Duk Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney research and clinical practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The Impact of DAZZEON αSleepClocks & sleep · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soo Jeong ChoiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Eun Hee ChoArtificial Kidney Unit, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Hye Min JoDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Changwook MinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Young Sok JiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Moo Yong ParkDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Jin Kuk KimDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Seung Duk HwangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintenance of a well-functioning vascular access and minimal needling pain are important goals for achieving adequate dialysis and improving the quality of life in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Far-infrared (FIR) therapy may improve endothelial function and increase access blood flow (Qa) and patency in HD patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of FIR therapy on Qa and patency, and needling pain in HD patients.

methodsThis prospective clinical trial enrolled 25 outpatients who maintained HD with arteriovenous fistula. The other 25 patients were matched as control with age, sex, and diabetes. FIR therapy was administered for 40 minutes during HD 3 times/wk and continued for 12 months. The Qa was measured by the ultrasound dilution method, whereas pain was measured by a numeric rating scale at baseline, then once per month.

resultsOne patient was transferred to another facility, and 7 patients stopped FIR therapy because of an increased body temperature and discomfort. FIR therapy improved the needling pain score from 4 to 2 after 1 year. FIR therapy increased the Qa by 3 months and maintained this change until 1 year, whereas control patients showed the decrease in Qa. The 1-year unassisted patency with FIR therapy was not significantly different from control.

conclusionFIR therapy improved needling pain. Although FIR therapy improved Qa, the unassisted patency was not different compared with the control. A larger and multicenter study is needed to evaluate the effect of FIR therapy.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous fistulaFar-infrared therapyHemodialysisPain

Identifiers

PMID27069856
PMCPMC4811988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.