Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069652›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2016

Temporal and phylogenetic evolution of the sauropod dinosaur body plan.

Karl T Bates, Philip D Mannion, Peter L Falkingham, Stephen L Brusatte, John R Hutchinson, Alejandro Otero, William I Sellers, Corwin Sullivan, Kent A Stevens, Vivian Allen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
20.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New perspectives on head and neck allometry and ecomorphology in tetrapods.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. New perspectives on body size and shape evolution in dinosaurs.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. When the lung invades: a review of avian postcranial skeletal pneumaticity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Swiss journal of palaeontology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Body size, shape and ecology in tetrapods.Nature communications · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Karl T BatesDepartment of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Aging and Chronic Disease , University of Liverpool , The Apex Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX , UK.
Philip D MannionDepartment of Earth Science and Engineering , Imperial College London , South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ , UK.
Peter L FalkinghamSchool of Natural Sciences and Psychology , Liverpool John Moores University , James Parsons Building, Bryon Street, Liverpool L3 3AF , UK.
Stephen L BrusatteSchool of GeoSciences , University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute , The King's Buildings, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE , UK.
John R HutchinsonDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Structure and Motion Laboratory , Royal Veterinary College, University of London , Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA , UK.
Alejandro OteroCONICET - División Paleontología de Vertebrados , Museo de La Plata , Paseo del Bosque s/n, La Plata B1900FWA , Argentina.
William I SellersFaculty of Life Sciences , University of Manchester , Michael Smith Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT , UK.
Corwin SullivanKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins , Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , 142 Xizhimenwai Dajie, Beijing 100044 , People's Republic of China.
Kent A StevensDepartment of Computer and Information Science , University of Oregon , Eugene, OR 97403 , USA.
Vivian AllenDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Structure and Motion Laboratory , Royal Veterinary College, University of London , Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA , UK.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARImperial College London · GBInstitute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology · CNLiverpool John Moores University · GBRoyal Veterinary College · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The colossal size and body plan of sauropod dinosaurs are unparalleled in terrestrial vertebrates. However, to date, there have been only limited attempts to examine temporal and phylogenetic patterns in the sauropod bauplan. Here, we combine three-dimensional computational models with phylogenetic reconstructions to quantify the evolution of whole-body shape and body segment properties across the sauropod radiation. Limitations associated with the absence of soft tissue preservation in fossils result in large error bars about mean absolute body shape predictions. However, applying any consistent skeleton : body volume ratio to all taxa does yield changes in body shape that appear concurrent with major macroevolutionary events in sauropod history. A caudad shift in centre-of-mass (CoM) in Middle Triassic Saurischia, associated with the evolution of bipedalism in various dinosaur lineages, was reversed in Late Triassic sauropodomorphs. A craniad CoM shift coincided with the evolution of quadrupedalism in the Late Triassic, followed by a more striking craniad shift in Late Jurassic-Cretaceous titanosauriforms, which included the largest sauropods. These craniad CoM shifts are strongly correlated with neck enlargement, a key innovation in sauropod evolution and pivotal to their gigantism. By creating a much larger feeding envelope, neck elongation is thought to have increased feeding efficiency and opened up trophic niches that were inaccessible to other herbivores. However, we find that relative neck size and CoM position are not strongly correlated with inferred feeding habits. Instead the craniad CoM positions of titanosauriforms appear closely linked with locomotion and environmental distributions, potentially contributing to the continued success of this group until the end-Cretaceous, with all other sauropods having gone extinct by the early Late Cretaceous.

Indexed as

biomechanicsbody shapecentre-of-masscomputer modellinggigantismphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID27069652
PMCPMC4821263
OpenAlexW2276322945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.