ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2016
In vitro and in vivo drug disposition of cilengitide in animals and human.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shaping Orthodontics of the Future: Concepts and Implications from a Cellular and Molecular Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Assessment of the Pharmacokinetics, Disposition, and Duration of Action of the Tumour-Targeting Peptide CEND-1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Anti-Cancer Effects of Cyclic Peptide ALOS4 in a Human Melanoma Mouse Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- MT1-MMP-Activated Liposomes to Improve Tumor Blood Perfusion and Drug Delivery for Enhanced Pancreatic Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Drug Biliary Excretion Using Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2019Review
- Review
- In vitro and in vivo drug disposition of cilengitide in animals and human.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cilengitide is very low permeable (1.0 nm/sec) stable cyclic pentapeptide containing an Arg-Gly-Asp motif responsible for selective binding to αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins administered intravenously (i.v.). In vivo studies in the mouse and Cynomolgus monkeys showed the major component in plasma was unchanged drug (>85%). These results, together with the absence of metabolism in vitro and in animals, indicate minimal metabolism in both species. The excretion of [(14)C]-cilengitide showed profound species differences, with a high renal excretion of the parent drug observed in Cynomolgus monkey (50% dose), but not in mouse (7 and 28%: m/f). Consistently fecal (biliary) secretion was high in mouse (87 and 66% dose: m/f) but low in Cynomolgus monkey (36.5%). Human volunteers administrated with [(14)C]-cilengitide showed that most of the dose was recovered in urine as unchanged drug (77.5%, referred to Becker et al. 2015), indicating that the Cynomolgus monkey was the closer species to human. In order to better understand the species difference between human and mouse, the hepatobiliary disposition of [(14)C]-cilengitide was determined in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes. Cilengitide exhibited modest biliary efflux (30-40%) in mouse, while in human hepatocytes this was negligible. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the uptake of cilengitide into human hepatocytes was minor and appeared to be passive. In summary, the extent of renal and biliary secretion of cilengitide appears to be highly species specific and is qualitatively well explained using sandwich hepatocyte culture models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.