Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069548›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2016

Evaluation of CCND1 amplification and CyclinD1 expression: diffuse and strong staining of CyclinD1 could have same predictive roles as CCND1 amplification in ER positive breast cancers.

Zhishuang Li, Jingjing Cui, Qiong Yu, Xiaojuan Wu, Aifeng Pan, Li Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic and Predictive Value ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Targeting WEE1 Kinase for Breast Cancer Therapeutics: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Research Progress of Sirtuin4 in Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhishuang LiDepartment of Pathology, Shandong University, School of Medicine 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China.
Jingjing CuiShandong University, School of Medicine 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250012, P.R. China.
Qiong YuThe Central Hospital of Zaozhuang Mining Group P.R. China.
Xiaojuan WuDepartment of Pathology, Shandong University, School of Medicine 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China.
Aifeng PanDepartment of Pathology, Shandong University, School of Medicine 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China.
Li LiDepartment of Pathology, Shandong University, School of Medicine 44 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China.
Shandong University · CNZaozhuang Municipal Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CCND1 is amplified in around 10-20% of primary breast cancers and preferentially occurs in ER positive tumors. Though CCND1 amplification was reported predicting poor response of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment and poor prognosis in ER positive breast cancers, there were controversial data regarding the predicting value of CyclinD1 protein overexpression. In this study, we detected CyclinD1 expression using immunohistochemistry and CCND1 gene copy number using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 355 invasive breast cancers with foci ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). CCND1 amplification was founded in 52 (14.6%) cases all of which showed moderate to strong CyclinD1 expression. However, majority of CCND1- tumors exhibited mild to moderate CyclinD1 staining. There were identical alterations in DCIS and the invasive lesions within the same tumor. CCND1 amplification was positively correlated with ER, PR and lymph node status (P<0.001) while negatively correlated with HER-2 amplification and p53 status (P<0.05). The majority of the CCND1 amplification/high CyclinD1 breast cancers were luminal B type while basal-like type often lost the expression of this protein. The ROC curve analysis showed that a cut-off point at which the immunostaining score of CyclinD1 is 6.5 could predict CCND1 gene amplification in breast cancer. This study indicated loss expression of CyclinD1 might be an important event in the tumorigenesis in basal-like breast cancers. Further, we confirmed an optimal cut-off point of immunostaining scores of CyclinD1 protein which could be used to predict the status of CCND1 gene and identify a subgroup of ER positive breast cancers with poor response to endocrine agents.

Indexed as

breast cancerCCND1Cyclin D1predictive markerstarget therapy

Identifiers

PMID27069548
PMCPMC4759424
OpenAlexW2419243182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.