Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069476›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of endocrinology2016

Robotic versus Open Thyroidectomy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: An Evidence-Based Review.

Shirley Yuk Wah Liu, Enders Kwok Wai Ng

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of endocrinology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of Robotics in Non-oropharyngeal Head and Neck Tumours.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Review
  7. Remote Access Thyroid Surgery: A Review of Literature.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evolution Strategies in Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy: Considerations on the First 449 Cases Performed.Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2019
    Article
  14. Robotic and Endoscopic Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Advances.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Initiating a Robotic Thyroidectomy Program in India.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shirley Yuk Wah LiuDepartment of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Enders Kwok Wai NgDepartment of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Prince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While open thyroidectomy (OT) is advocated as the gold standard treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer, the contemporary use of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) is often controversial. Although RT combines the unique benefits of the surgical robot and remote access thyroidectomy, its applicability on cancer patients is challenged by the questionable oncological benefits and safety. This review aims to analyze the current literature evidence in comparing RT to OT on thyroid cancers for their perioperative and oncological outcomes. To date, no randomized controlled trial is available in comparing RT to OT. All published studies are nonrandomized or retrospective comparisons. Current data suggests that RT compares less favorably than OT for longer operative time, higher cost, and possibly inferior oncological control with lower number of central lymph nodes retrieved. In terms of morbidity, quality of life outcomes, and short-term recurrence rates, RT and OT are comparable. While conventional OT continues to be appropriate for most thyroid cancers, RT should better be continued by expert surgeons on selected patients who have low-risk thyroid cancers and have high expectations on cosmetic outcomes. Future research should embark on prospective randomized studies for unbiased comparisons. Long-term follow-up studies are also needed to evaluate outcomes on recurrence and survival.

Identifiers

PMID27069476
PMCPMC4812387
OpenAlexW2298443995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.