Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069448›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2016

Electrochemotherapy by pulsed electromagnetic field treatment (PEMF) in mouse melanoma B16F10 in vivo.

Simona Kranjc, Matej Kranjc, Janez Scancar, Jure Jelenc, Gregor Sersa, Damijan Miklavcic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bioelectricity in dental medicine: a narrative review.Biomedical engineering online · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Bioresonance Application in Mice with Depressive-Like Behavior.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Electrical Stimulation for Immune Modulation in Cancer Treatments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Effects of a Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on the Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simona KranjcDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matej KranjcUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering.
Janez ScancarJozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jure JelencIskra Medical LLC, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gregor SersaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Damijan MiklavcicUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering.
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIJožef Stefan Institute · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) induces pulsed electric field, which presumably increases membrane permeabilization of the exposed cells, similar to the conventional electroporation. Thus, contactless PEMF could represent a promising approach for drug delivery. MATERIALS AND

methodsNoninvasive electroporation was performed by magnetic field pulse generator connected to an applicator consisting of round coil. Subcutaneous mouse B16F10 melanoma tumors were treated with intravenously injection of cisplatin (CDDP) (4 mg/kg), PEMF (480 bipolar pulses, at frequency of 80 Hz, pulse duration of 340 μs) or with the combination of both therapies (electrochemotherapy - PEMF + CDDP). Antitumor effectiveness of treatments was evaluated by tumor growth delay assay. In addition, the platinum (Pt) uptake in tumors and serum, as well as Pt bound to the DNA in the cells and Pt in the extracellular fraction were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

resultsThe antitumor effectiveness of electrochemotherapy with CDDP mediated by PEMF was comparable to the conventional electrochemotherapy with CDDP, with the induction of 2.3 days and 3.0 days tumor growth delay, respectively. The exposure of tumors to PEMF only, had no effect on tumor growth, as well as the injection of CDDP only. The antitumor effect in combined treatment was related to increased drug uptake into the electroporated tumor cells, demonstrated by increased amount of Pt bound to the DNA. Approximately 2-fold increase in cellular uptake of Pt was measured.

conclusionsThe obtained results in mouse melanoma model in vivo demonstrate the possible use of PEMF induced electroporation for biomedical applications, such as electrochemotherapy. The main advantages of electroporation mediated by PEMF are contactless and painless application, as well as effective electroporation compared to conventional electroporation.

Indexed as

bipolar pulsesCDDPcontactless electroporationelectrochemotherapymouse melanomaplatinum determinationpulsed electromagnetic field

Identifiers

PMID27069448
PMCPMC4825331
OpenAlexW2256821739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.