Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069401›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology

Validation of an air-liquid interface toxicological set-up using Cu, Pd, and Ag well-characterized nanostructured aggregates and spheres.

C R Svensson, S S Ameer, L Ludvigsson, N Ali, A Alhamdow, M E Messing, J Pagels, A Gudmundsson, M Bohgard, E Sanfins and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) for online monitoring of delivered dose in an in vitro aerosol exposure system.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

C R SvenssonDepartment of Design Sciences, Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
S S AmeerDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
L LudvigssonDepartment of Physics, Solid State Physics, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
N AliDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
A AlhamdowDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden ; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
M E MessingDepartment of Physics, Solid State Physics, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
J PagelsDepartment of Design Sciences, Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
A GudmundssonDepartment of Design Sciences, Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
M BohgardDepartment of Design Sciences, Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
E SanfinsInstitute of Emerging Diseases and Innovative Therapies (iMETI), Division of Prions and Related Diseases (SEPIA), Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), 18 Route du Panorama, 92265 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
M KåredalDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
K BrobergDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden ; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
J RisslerDepartment of Design Sciences, Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden ; Chemistry, Materials and Surfaces, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, 223 70 Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractSystems for studying the toxicity of metal aggregates on the airways are normally not suited for evaluating the effects of individual particle characteristics. This study validates a set-up for toxicological studies of metal aggregates using an air-liquid interface approach. The set-up used a spark discharge generator capable of generating aerosol metal aggregate particles and sintered near spheres. The set-up also contained an exposure chamber, The Nano Aerosol Chamber for In Vitro Toxicity (NACIVT). The system facilitates online characterization capabilities of mass mobility, mass concentration, and number size distribution to determine the exposure. By dilution, the desired exposure level was controlled. Primary and cancerous airway cells were exposed to copper (Cu), palladium (Pd), and silver (Ag) aggregates, 50-150 nm in median diameter. The aggregates were composed of primary particles <10 nm in diameter. For Cu and Pd, an exposure of sintered aerosol particles was also produced. The doses of the particles were expressed as particle numbers, masses, and surface areas. For the Cu, Pd, and Ag aerosol particles, a range of mass surface concentrations on the air-liquid interface of 0.4-10.7, 0.9-46.6, and 0.1-1.4 µg/cm GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT:

Indexed as

A549AggregatesAir–liquid interfaceCytokinesDMA-APMHealth effectsNACIVTSAECToxicity

Identifiers

PMID27069401
PMCPMC4805710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.