Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069398›Full record

ReviewBreeding science2016

Diversity in the carotenoid profiles and the expression of genes related to carotenoid accumulation among citrus genotypes.

Yoshinori Ikoma, Hikaru Matsumoto, Masaya Kato

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breeding science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CitrusHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimization of Extraction Conditions of Carotenoids fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. IlluminaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshinori IkomaCitrus Research Division, NARO Institute of Fruit Tree Science , 485-6 Okitsunakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, Shizuoka 424-0292 , Japan.
Hikaru MatsumotoCitrus Research Division, NARO Institute of Fruit Tree Science , 485-6 Okitsunakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, Shizuoka 424-0292 , Japan.
Masaya KatoDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University , 836 Ohya, Suruga, Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8529 , Japan.
Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science · JPShizuoka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotenoids are not only important to the plants themselves but also are beneficial to human health. Since citrus fruit is a good source of carotenoids for the human diet, it is important to study carotenoid profiles and the accumulation mechanism in citrus fruit. Thus, in the present paper, we describe the diversity in the carotenoid profiles of fruit among citrus genotypes. In regard to carotenoids, such as β-cryptoxanthin, violaxanthin, lycopene, and β-citraurin, the relationship between the carotenoid profile and the expression of carotenoid-biosynthetic genes is discussed. Finally, recent results of quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses of carotenoid contents and expression levels of carotenoid-biosynthetic genes in citrus fruit are shown.

Indexed as

carotenoidcitrusgene expressionquantitative trait locusviolaxanthinβ-citraurinβ-cryptoxanthin

Identifiers

PMID27069398
PMCPMC4780797
OpenAlexW2326714134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.