Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069382›Full record

ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2016

Striatal dopamine, reward, and decision making in schizophrenia.

Lorenz Deserno, Florian Schlagenhauf, Andreas Heinz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Diminished differentiation of rewards in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Neurochemistry of Visual Attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorenz DesernoMax Planck Fellow Group "Cognitive and Affective Control of Behavioral Adaptation," Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charite Mitte, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Florian SchlagenhaufMax Planck Fellow Group "Cognitive and Affective Control of Behavioral Adaptation," Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charite Mitte, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Andreas HeinzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charite Mitte, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated striatal dopamine function is one of the best-established findings in schizophrenia. In this review, we discuss causes and consequences of this striata! dopamine alteration. We first summarize earlier findings regarding striatal reward processing and anticipation using functional neuroimaging. Secondly, we present a series of recent studies that are exemplary for a particular research approach: a combination of theory-driven reinforcement learning and decision-making tasks in combination with computational modeling and functional neuroimaging. We discuss why this approach represents a promising tool to understand underlying mechanisms of symptom dimensions by dissecting the contribution of multiple behavioral control systems working in parallel. We also discuss how it can advance our understanding of the neurobiological implementation of such functions. Thirdly, we review evidence regarding the topography of dopamine dysfunction within the striatum. Finally, we present conclusions and outline important aspects to be considered in future studies.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsCorpus StriatumDecision MakingDopamineFunctional NeuroimagingHumansNerve NetSchizophreniaDopaminecomputational modelingcomputational psychiatrydecision makingreward anticipationreward prediction errorschizophreniastriatal dopamine

Identifiers

PMID27069382
PMCPMC4826774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.