Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069055›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

The co-creation of meaningful action: bridging enaction and interactional sociology.

Hanne De Jaegher, Anssi Peräkylä, Melisa Stevanovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dimensions of Musical Creativity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Attending to and neglecting people: bridging neuroscience, psychology and sociology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  12. What does the interactive brain hypothesis mean for social neuroscience? A dialogue.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanne De JaegherDepartment of Logic and Philosophy of Science, IAS-Research Centre for Life, Mind, and Society, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastián, Spain Department of Informatics, Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, and Centre for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK h.de.jaegher@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-6410
Anssi PeräkyläDepartment of Social Research, Finnish Center of Excellence on Intersubjectivity in Interaction, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Melisa StevanovicDepartment of Social Research, Finnish Center of Excellence on Intersubjectivity in Interaction, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What makes possible the co-creation of meaningful action? In this paper, we go in search of an answer to this question by combining insights from interactional sociology and enaction. Both research schools investigate social interactions as such, and conceptualize their organization in terms of autonomy. We ask what it could mean for an interaction to be autonomous, and discuss the structures and processes that contribute to and are maintained in the so-called interaction order. We also discuss the role played by individual vulnerability as well as the vulnerability of social interaction processes in the co-creation of meaningful action. Finally, we outline some implications of this interdisciplinary fraternization for the empirical study of social understanding, in particular in social neuroscience and psychology, pointing out the need for studies based on dynamic systems approaches on origins and references of coordination, and experimental designs to help understand human co-presence.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterpersonal RelationsHumansSociologyconversation analysiscoordinationGoffmaninteractional autonomyparticipatory sense-makingsocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID27069055
PMCPMC4843616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.