Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27069043›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Attending to and neglecting people: bridging neuroscience, psychology and sociology.

Riitta Hari, Mikko Sams, Lauri Nummenmaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brain and behavioral alterations in subjects with social anxiety dominated by empathic embarrassment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain-to-brain coupling during handholding is associated with pain reduction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Riitta HariDepartment of Art, School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Aalto University, PO Box 31000, 00076 AALTO, Helsinki, Finland Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, PO Box 31000, 00076 AALTO, Helsinki, Finland riitta.hari@aalto.fi.
Mikko SamsDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, PO Box 31000, 00076 AALTO, Helsinki, Finland.
Lauri NummenmaaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, PO Box 31000, 00076 AALTO, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

European Research Council 232946European Research Council 313000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human behaviour is context-dependent-based on predictions and influenced by the environment and other people. We live in a dynamic world where both the social stimuli and their context are constantly changing. Similar dynamic, natural stimuli should, in the future, be increasingly used to study social brain functions, with parallel development of appropriate signal-analysis methods. Understanding dynamic neural processes also requires accurate time-sensitive characterization of the behaviour. To go beyond the traditional stimulus-response approaches, brain activity should be recorded simultaneously from two interacting subjects to reveal why human social interaction is critically different from just reacting to each other. This theme issue on Attending to and neglecting people contains original work and review papers on person perception and social interaction. The articles cover research from neuroscience, psychology, robotics, animal interaction research and microsociology. Some of the papers are co-authored by scientists who presented their own, independent views in the recent Attention and Performance XXVI conference but were brave enough to join forces with a colleague having a different background and views. In the future, information needs to converge across disciplines to provide us a more holistic view of human behaviour, its interactive nature, as well as the temporal dynamics of our social world.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorHumansNeurosciencesPerceptionbrainmutual understandingneuroimagingpredictionsocial bondingsocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID27069043
PMCPMC4843604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.