Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27068930›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2016

Distribution of Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae in Hard Ticks (Ixodida: Ixodidae) from Panamanian Urban and Rural Environments (2007-2013).

Sergio E Bermúdez, Angélica M Castro, Diomedes Trejos, Gleydis G García, Amanda Gabster, Roberto J Miranda, Yamitzel Zaldívar, Luis E Paternina

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Control ofInfectious Disease Modelling · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ticks infesting humans in Central America: A review of their relevance in public health.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Ticks and tick-borne Rickettsia in El Salvador.Experimental & applied acarology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular screening for tick-borne bacteria and hematozoa inCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A review of the genusResearch and reports in tropical medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergio E BermúdezInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud, Panama, Panama. bermudezsec@gmail.com.
Angélica M CastroInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud, Panama, Panama.
Diomedes TrejosGrupo de Estudios con Ectoparásitos, Panama, Panama.
Gleydis G GarcíaInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud, Panama, Panama.
Amanda GabsterInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud, Panama, Panama.
Roberto J MirandaInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud, Panama, Panama.
Yamitzel ZaldívarInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud, Panama, Panama.
Luis E PaterninaGrupo de Estudios con Ectoparásitos, Panama, Panama.
Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud · PAUniversidad de Panamá · PAUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne rickettsiosis is an important emerging disease in Panama; to date, there have been 12 confirmed cases, including eight fatalities. To evaluate the distribution of rickettsiae in Panamanian ticks, we collected questing and on-host ticks in urban and rural towns in elevations varying between 0 and 2300 m. A total of 63 sites (13 urban and 50 rural towns) were used to develop models of spatial distributions. We found the following tick species: Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. (present in 54 of 63 towns and cities), Amblyomma mixtum (45/63), Dermacentor nitens (40/63), A. ovale (37/63), Rhipicephalus microplus (33/63), A. oblongoguttatum (33/63), Ixodes affinis (3/63), and Ixodes boliviensis (2/63). Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. was present in urban and rural towns, and other species were present only in rural towns. DNA was extracted from 408 R. sanguineus s.l., 387 A. mixtum, 103 A. ovale, and 11 A. oblongoguttatum and later tested for rickettsiae genes using PCR. Rickettsia DNA was detected in ticks from 21 of 63 localities. Rickettsia rickettsii was detected in five A. mixtum (1.29%), and Candidatus "Rickettsia amblyommii" was found in 138 A. mixtum (35%), 14 R. sanguineus (3.4%), and one A. ovale (0.9%). These results suggest that much of rural Panama is suitable for the expansion of tick populations and could favor the appearance of new tick-borne rickettsiosis outbreaks.

Indexed as

Rickettsia InfectionsTicksAnimalsIxodidaePanamaPolymerase Chain ReactionRickettsiaRural PopulationUrban Populationixodidaemolecular surveillancePanamaRickettsia spp.spatial distribution model

Identifiers

PMID27068930
OpenAlexW2336156753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.